Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35243613›Full record

ArticleAustralian veterinary journal2022

A pilot study on bacterial isolates associated with purulent vaginal discharge in dairy cows in the south-west region of Western Australia.

P A Ludbey, S Sahibzada, C H Annandale, I D Robertson, F K Waichigo, M S Tufail, J L Valenzuela, J W Aleri

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Australian veterinary journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

P A LudbeySchool of Veterinary Medicine, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, 6150, Australia.
S SahibzadaSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, 6150, Australia.
C H AnnandaleSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, 6150, Australia.
I D RobertsonSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, 6150, Australia.
F K WaichigoBrunswick Veterinary Services, Brunswick Junction, Western Australia, 6224, Australia.
M S TufailSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, 6150, Australia.
J L ValenzuelaSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, 6150, Australia.
J W AleriSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, 6150, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4498-2152
Murdoch University · AUBrunswick (United States) · US

Funding

Dairy Australia 16085Murdoch UniversityWestern Dairy 17998
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the bacterial isolates associated with postpartum endometritis among dairy cows in Western Australia and their antimicrobial susceptibility profiles. A cross-sectional study was conducted between June-October 2020. Endometritis was defined as evidence of mucopurulent to purulent vaginal discharge 60-100 days postpartum. Vaginal discharge samples were obtained, cultured, identified and tested for antimicrobial susceptibility. A total of 118 bacterial isolates were grown from 46 animals, representing 36 species. The bacteria isolated from both aerobic and anaerobic cultures included Bacillus (60.2%), Streptococcus (12.7%), Trueperella (10.1%), Escherichia (6.7%) and Staphylococcus (5.9%). The remaining genera <5% were Histophilus, Aeroccocus, Enterococcus and Moraxella. Resistance was variable between isolates, but the highest resistance levels were observed in Streptococcal and Bacillus isolates to enrofloxacin, clindamycin and erythromycin, respectively. All Streptococcal isolates exhibited 100% resistance to enrofloxacin, and the greatest resistance levels were found in Streptococcus luteinises to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 83%, clindamycin 66% and 33% quinupristin-dalfopristin. There was 84.5% resistance to clindamycin and 35.2% to erythromycin in the Bacillus isolates, with the highest resistance found in Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus subtilis. Escherichia coli exhibited 12.5% resistance to gentamycin, ceftiofur, whereas amoxicillin-clavulanic acid exhibited 37.5%. Within the Staphylococcal isolates, 28.5%, 28.5%, 42.8% and 14.2% resistance to ceftiofur, erythromycin, cefoxitin, penicillin and tetracycline were observed, respectively. The presence of resistance to important antimicrobials for human use, such as cephalosporins, macrolides and fluoroquinolones, highlights the need for judicious use of antimicrobials in dairy cattle.

Indexed as

EndometritisVaginal DischargeAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCattleClindamycinCross-Sectional StudiesDrug Resistance, BacterialEnrofloxacinErythromycinEscherichia coliFemaleHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPilot ProjectsStaphylococcusAnti-Bacterial AgentsClindamycinEnrofloxacinErythromycinantimicrobial resistancebacteriadairy cattleendometritis

Identifiers

PMID35243613
PMCPMC9315004
OpenAlexW4214905704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.