Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35243548›Full record

ReviewNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2022

Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators versus interferon beta for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: findings from randomized controlled trials.

Siyuan Yang, Xiang Li, Jiahe Wang, Tianyi Wang, Zhongmou Xu, Heng Gao, Gang Chen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Siyuan Yang *Department of Clinical Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China.
Xiang Li *Department of Clinical Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China.
Jiahe WangDepartment of Clinical Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China.
Tianyi WangDepartment of Clinical Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China.
Zhongmou XuDepartment of Clinical Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China.
Heng GaoDepartment of Clinical Medicine, The Affiliated Jiangyin Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, No. 3 yingrui road, Jiangyin, 214400, Jiangsu Province, China. brainsurgeon@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2718-1505
Gang ChenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China.
Soochow University · CNJiangyin People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs one kind of disease-modifying therapies, sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) modulators such as fingolimod, ozanimod, and siponimod have been approved or are being developed to treat multiple sclerosis (MS). Several randomized controlled trials (RCT) have been implemented to compare the efficacy and safety of S1PR modulators versus interferon beta in the treatment of people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).

methodWe searched RCTs which were implemented from January 2010 to June 2020 by searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library databases, and the Central Register of Controlled Trials. Finally, five RCTs were included in our study after carefully choosing.

resultWe pooled 4304 patients from 5 RCTs. The primary outcome was the annualized relapse rate. We found that the annualized relapse rate in the S1PR modulator group is 20% less than that in the interferon beta group (95%CI, - 0.32 to - 0.07, P = 0.002). S1PR modulators led to a significant reduction in number of new or enlarging T2 lesions per scan and number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions compared with interferon beta. Moreover, S1PR modulators can also improve 54-item multiple sclerosis quality of life (MSQOL-54) physical health composite score (P = 0.0005).

conclusionS1PR modulators exhibited good efficacy and safety for the treatment of RRMS compared with interferon beta. According to follow-up trials, S1PR modulators can improve MSQOL-54 physical health composite score so that it may be beneficial to neurological recovery which need more research to confirm.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingSphingosine 1 Phosphate Receptor ModulatorsHumansInterferon-betaInterferon beta-1aRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecurrenceSphingosine-1-Phosphate ReceptorsInterferon-betaInterferon beta-1aSphingosine 1 Phosphate Receptor ModulatorsSphingosine-1-Phosphate ReceptorsAdverse effectsAnnualized relapse rateRelapsing–remitting multiple sclerosisS1PR modulators

Identifiers

PMID35243548
OpenAlexW4214844683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.