ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2022
Electrical cardiometry in monitoring percutaneous closure of ductus arteriosus in preterm infants: a case study on five patients.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- A recommendation for the use of electrical biosensing technology in neonatology.Pediatric research · 2025Guideline
- Transcatheter closure in preterm infants with patent ductus arteriosus: feasibility, results, hemodynamic monitoring and future prospectives.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patent ductus arteriosus closure by catheter-based interventions has become the preferred therapeutic choice. However, hemodynamic perturbances associated to this procedure have not yet been investigated. This study sought to examine the on-site hemodynamic impact caused by the procedure in preterm neonates. In this study, hemodynamic monitoring was obtained in a non-invasive way using electrical cardiometry in five preterm infants who underwent percutaneous patent ductus arteriosus closing at ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda of Milan. All five infants underwent successful transcatheter closures. All patients experienced immediate hemodynamic changes upon ductal closing. Significative modifications occurred mainly in heart contractility, cardiac output, and stroke volume. In three cases, there was also a significative increase of systemic vascular resistance which persisted for 4 h after closing. While in two cases they spontaneously reduced with an amelioration of cardiac output and contractility, in the other case they were persistently high, associated with an hypertensive crisis and a progressive reduction of cardiac functions. For these reasons, milrinone was started and hemodynamic parameters returned normal in about 3 h, so therapy was discontinued. Conclusions: Our single-center, prospective, consecutive, case series demonstrated hemodynamic aberrations due to sudden closure of a patent ductus arteriosus. Moreover, post procedural hemodynamic monitoring is important to precociously detect possible cardiac impairment and start an adequate therapy. What is Known: • It has previously suggested a temporarily impairment in cardiac output following patent ductus arteriosus closing. • Little is known about the other hemodynamic parameters during the procedure and how they change in the next hours according to the new hemodynamic status. What is New: • The persistence of increased systemic vascular resistance after percutaneous closure of ductus arteriosus could suggest the occurrence of hemodynamic complications. • Electrical cardiometry was useful to early detect postoperative hemodynamic changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.