ArticleDie Anaesthesiologie2022
[Chances and challenges of increasing digitalization of teaching in the discipline anesthesiology from the perspective of students].
Article in Die Anaesthesiologie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A 15-Year Case Study of the Structures and Outcomes in a Blended Learning Postgraduate Master Programme for Periodontology and Implant Therapy.European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe · 2026Article
- Digital learning effectiveness and strategies in medical training: perspectives on motivation and attitude among interns and PGY trainees.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Comparing ChatGPT and Dental Students' Performance in an Introduction to Dental Anatomy Examination: A Cross-Sectional Study.European journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Education Research: Teaching Neurologic Emergencies Through Serious Games: A Randomized Comparative Intervention Study.Neurology. Education · 2025Article
- Self-Directed Learning and Competencies as Perceived by New Graduates Before and After the Pandemic: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of nursing management · 2025Article
- Students' and lecturers' perspectives on the implementation of online learning in medical education due to COVID-19 in Germany: a cross-sectional pilot study.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Digitalization in Medicine: Are German Medical Students Well Prepared for the Future?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe coronavirus pandemic caused a sudden change in medical education worldwide and induced a shift towards digital teaching. Previously, most courses were organized for students in physical presence on campus, while a few institutions already complemented these with blended learning methods, combining digital teaching with clinical presence; however, the use of digital teaching was heterogeneous, ranging from the use of PowerPoint slides to the application of virtual patients and telemedicine.
objectiveThis study aimed to identify challenges and opportunities arising from the different tools used in digital teaching, such as recorded lectures or online seminars, and the role of hands-on clinical experience. In addition, the study examined student attitudes and experiences with the nearly all-digital semester beginning in spring 2020. These findings may help to better understand the impact of digital teaching on students and provide guidance on how to optimize digital medical teaching in the future.
methodsA questionnaire with a 5-point Likert scale was developed to assess students' experiences with digital teaching at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in a cross-sectional study. The questionnaire was distributed to all medical students at the University of Mainz, Germany, who attended an anesthesiology course with asynchronously recorded lectures replacing traditional on-campus lectures during the pandemic. A total of 766 students in 4 courses met these criteria and received the online questionnaire for anonymous and voluntary response.
resultsA total number of 141 students responded, resulting in a response rate of 18.4%. Almost all students had access to the appropriate technology to participate in digital courses and 80.9% indicated seeing more recorded lectures compared to previous face-to-face lectures on campus. Moreover, 67.4% reported that they paused the asynchronous lectures to look up additional information and 95.7% stated that they appreciated the possibility to view lectures regardless of time and location. Hence, 84.3% said they would prefer digital lectures over face-to-face lectures in the future; however, 28.4% missed the interaction with teachers during lectures. Thus, 94.3% of the students appreciated the online seminars in terms of theoretical knowledge but the majority missed the practical aspects in the courses. Overall, 78.0% responded that the digital availability of material and digital teaching formats helped them to enhance their independent learning abilities.
conclusionThis study highlights several opportunities and challenges associated with digital teaching. The availability of prerecorded lectures at any time and place seems to facilitate access and increases student motivation. It also promotes individualization of student learning. Main disadvantages are the lack of communication with teachers and other students as well as the missing opportunity to reinforce the theoretical knowledge through application in practical courses, which, however, are essential for medical education. Therefore, a possible solution in the future could be the introduction of the "inverted classroom" concept, as it focuses on application and deepening of clinical skills in interactive classes, while the theoretical knowledge acquisition is taught in a digital teaching environment. The present study proposes the introduction of blended learning concepts to enhance the benefits of digital teaching while minimizing the identified disadvantages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.