Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35243396›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology open science2022

Association Between a 22-feature Genomic Classifier and Biopsy Gleason Upgrade During Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.

Benjamin H Press, Tashzna Jones, Olamide Olawoyin, Soum D Lokeshwar, Syed N Rahman, Ghazal Khajir, Daniel W Lin, Matthew R Cooperberg, Stacy Loeb, Burcu F Darst and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology open science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. High Omega-3, Low Omega-6 Diet With Fish Oil for Men With Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance: The CAPFISH-3 Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Benjamin H PressDepartment of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Tashzna JonesDepartment of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Olamide OlawoyinDepartment of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Soum D LokeshwarDepartment of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Syed N RahmanDepartment of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Ghazal KhajirDepartment of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Daniel W LinDepartment of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Matthew R CooperbergDepartment of Urology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Stacy LoebDepartments of Urology and Population Health, New York University Langone Health and Manhattan Veterans Affairs Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Burcu F DarstUniversity of Southern California Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Yingye ZhengFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Cancer Prevention Program, Public Health Sciences, Seattle, WA, USA.
Ronald C ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
John S WitteDepartment of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Tyler M SeibertDepartment of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
William J CatalonaDepartment of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Michael S LeapmanDepartment of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Preston C SprenkleDepartment of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Yale University · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USNorthwestern University · USNYU Langone Health · USStanford University · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Kansas Medical Center · USUniversity of Southern California · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Targeting FOXA1-downstream pathways: a novel therapeutic strategy for castration-resistant prostate cancerP50CA180995 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI ABDULKADIR, SARKI A., HUSSAIN, MAHA H · 2015 to 2025
$19.9M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA180995
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough the Decipher genomic classifier has been validated as a prognostic tool for several prostate cancer endpoints, little is known about its role in assessing the risk of biopsy reclassification for patients on active surveillance, a key event that often triggers treatment.

objectiveTo evaluate the association between Decipher genomic classifier scores and biopsy Gleason upgrading among patients on active surveillance. DESIGN SETTING AND

participantsThis was a retrospective cohort study among patients with low- and favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer on active surveillance who underwent biopsy-based Decipher testing as part of their clinical care. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: We evaluated the association between the Decipher score and any increase in biopsy Gleason grade group (GG) using univariable and multivariable logistic regression. We compared the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for models comprising baseline clinical variables with or without the Decipher score. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: We identified 133 patients for inclusion with a median age of 67.7 yr and median prostate-specific of 5.6 ng/ml. At enrollment, 75.9% had GG1 and 24.1% had GG2 disease. Forty-three patients experienced biopsy upgrading. On multivariable logistic regression, the Decipher score was significantly associated with biopsy upgrading (odds ratio 1.37 per 0.10 unit increase, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.79;

conclusionsThe Decipher genomic classifier score was associated with short-term biopsy Gleason upgrading among patients on active surveillance. PATIENT SUMMARY: The results from this study indicate that among patients with prostate cancer undergoing active surveillance, those with higher Decipher scores were more likely to have higher-grade disease found over time. These findings indicate that the Decipher test might be useful for guiding the intensity of monitoring during active surveillance, such as more frequent biopsy for patients with higher scores.

Indexed as

Active surveillanceDecipherProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID35243396
PMCPMC8883188
OpenAlexW4220807416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.