Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35243332›Full record

ReviewBiofilm2022

Yicen Lin, Romain Briandet, Ákos T Kovács

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biofilm, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. In Situ Electrochemical Monitoring ofChemical & biomedical imaging · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cultivated meat microbiological safety considerations and practices.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Prevalence Trends of Foodborne PathogensInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Colonization ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yicen LinBacterial Interactions and Evolution Group, DTU Bioengineering, Technical University of Denmark, 2800, Lyngby, Denmark.
Romain BriandetUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Micalis Institute, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Ákos T KovácsBacterial Interactions and Evolution Group, DTU Bioengineering, Technical University of Denmark, 2800, Lyngby, Denmark.
Ørsted (Denmark) · DKAgroParisTech · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofilm formation is a ubiquitous process of bacterial communities that enables them to survive and persist in various environmental niches. The

Indexed as

Bacillus cereusBiofilmFoodSporulation

Identifiers

PMID35243332
PMCPMC8861577
OpenAlexW4213227819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.