Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35243305›Full record

ArticleKidney medicine2022

Direction- and Angle-Assisted Buttonhole Cannulation of Arteriovenous Fistula in Hemodialysis Patients: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Marit I Rønning, Willem P Benschop, Marius A Øvrehus, Maria Hultstrøm, Stein I Hallan

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01536548 (Indicating Direction and Angle for Button-hole Cannulating of AV-fistula in Hemodialysis Patients - a Randomized Controlled Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01536548 nacompletednot on this map

Indicating Direction and Angle for Button-hole Cannulating of AV-fistula in Hemodialysis Patients - a Randomized Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyRan2012 to 2012Enrolled83ConditionsChronic Kidney Disease, Kidney FailureArmsSkin drawing, No skin drawing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marit I RønningDepartment of Nephrology, St. Olav Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Willem P BenschopDepartment of Medicine, Innlandet Hospital, Lillehammer, Norway.
Marius A ØvrehusDepartment of Nephrology, St. Olav Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Maria HultstrømDepartment of Nephrology, St. Olav Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Stein I HallanDepartment of Nephrology, St. Olav Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
St Olav's University Hospital · NOInnlandet Hospital Trust · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RATIONALE &

objectiveArteriovenous fistula cannulation with the buttonhole technique is often preferred by patients but has been associated with an increased infection risk. Guidelines disagree on whether it should be abandoned, thus we assessed a technologically simple method to facilitate gentler arteriovenous fistula cannulation with potentially less discomfort and damage to the epithelial lining of the buttonhole tract. STUDY

design8-week, prospective, open-label, randomized controlled trial. SETTING &

participantsPatients with buttonhole tracts receiving hemodialysis at 7 dialysis centers in Norway were randomized to the intervention group (43 patients, 658 cannulations) or control group (40 patients, 611 cannulations).

interventionDirection and angle of the established buttonhole tract were marked on the forearm skin in the intervention group, whereas the control group had no structured cannulation information system. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was successful cannulation, defined as correct placement of both blunt needles at the first attempt without needing to change needles, perform extra perforations, or reposition the needle. The secondary outcomes were patient-reported difficulty of cannulation (verbal rating scale: 1 = very easy, 6 = impossible) and intensity of pain (numeric rating scale: 0 = no pain, 10 = unbearable pain).

resultsAfter a 2-week run-in period, successful cannulation was achieved in 73.9% and 74.8% of the patients in the intervention and control groups, respectively (relative risk [RR], 0.99; 95% CI, 0.87-1.12; LIMITATIONS: Unable to evaluate hard end points such as infections and thrombosis owing to the small sample size.

conclusionsMarking direction and angle of cannulation did not improve cannulation success rates; however, patients more often reported an unproblematic procedure and less pain.

fundingNone.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01536548).

Indexed as

Angle and directionarteriovenous fistulabuttonholecannulationguidelineshemodialysispainrandomized clinical trialskin markingssuccessful placement

Identifiers

PMID35243305
PMCPMC8861953
OpenAlexW3215841867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.