Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35243279›Full record

ReviewJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology2022

Nucleic acid biomarkers to assess graft injury after liver transplantation.

Elissa Bardhi, Jennifer McDaniels, Thomas Rousselle, Daniel G Maluf, Valeria R Mas

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Beyond a Biomarker: Investigations of a Proinflammatory Role for Cell-Free DNA in Liver Transplant Ischemia and Reperfusion.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elissa BardhiSurgical Sciences Division, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Jennifer McDanielsSurgical Sciences Division, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Thomas RousselleSurgical Sciences Division, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Daniel G MalufSurgical Sciences Division, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Valeria R MasSurgical Sciences Division, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
University of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

Assessment of Donor Quality for Improving Kidney Transplant OutcomesR01DK109581 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI Kellie J. Archer, Valeria Raquel Mas · 2017 to 2026
$4.0M
Dissecting the role of dynamic epigenome prompting pathways leading to kidney allograft fibrosisR01DK122682 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI MAS, VALERIA RAQUEL · 2019 to 2023
$3.6M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK109581NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK122682
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many risk factors and complications impact the success of liver transplantation, such as ischaemia-reperfusion injury, acute rejection, and primary graft dysfunction. Molecular biomarkers have the potential to accurately diagnose, predict, and monitor injury progression or organ failure. There is a critical opportunity for reliable and non-invasive biomarkers to reduce the organ shortage by enabling i) the assessment of donor organ quality, ii) the monitoring of short- and long-term graft function, and iii) the prediction of acute and chronic disease development. To date, no established molecular biomarkers have been used to guide clinical decision-making in transplantation. In this review, we outline the recent advances in cell-free nucleic acid biomarkers for monitoring graft injury in liver transplant recipients. Prior work in this area can be divided into two categories: biomarker discovery and validation studies. Circulating nucleic acids (CNAs) can be found in the extracellular environment pertaining to different biological fluids such as bile, blood, urine, and perfusate. CNAs that are packaged into extracellular vesicles may facilitate intercellular and interorgan communication. Thus, decoding their biological function, cellular origins and molecular composition is imperative for diagnosing causes of graft injury, guiding immunosuppression and improving overall patient survival. Herein, we discuss the most promising molecular biomarkers, their state of development, and the critical aspects of study design in biomarker research for early detection of post-transplant liver injury. Future advances in biomarker studies are expected to personalise post-transplant therapy, leading to improved patient care and outcomes.

Indexed as

ACR, acute cellular rejectionbiomarkersCIT, cold ischaemia timeCNA(s), circulating nucleic aciddd-cfDNA, donor-derived cell-free DNAddPCR, digital droplet PCRdonor-derived DNAEV(s), extracellular vesiclesextracellular vesiclesHCC, hepatocellular carcinomaHLA, human leukocyte antigenLFTs, liver function testsliver transplantationLT, liver transplantationmicroRNAsmiRNA, microRNAmolecular diagnosticspersonalized therapyRT-qPCR, reverse-transcription quantitative PCRTCMR, T cell-mediated rejectiontranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID35243279
PMCPMC8856989
OpenAlexW4221088428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.