ReviewJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology2022
Nucleic acid biomarkers to assess graft injury after liver transplantation.
Review in JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Donor-derived cell-free DNA as a noninvasive biomarker for diagnosis and monitoring of acute rejection after liver transplantation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Beyond a Biomarker: Investigations of a Proinflammatory Role for Cell-Free DNA in Liver Transplant Ischemia and Reperfusion.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026Article
- Plasma microRNAs and chemokines as biomarkers for rejection in liver transplantation with score verification and tissue correlation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- L-FABP as a Potential Biomolecular Marker of Liver Graft Injury.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Exosomal Small RNA From Donor Liver Preservation Solution Exhibits Molecular Signatures That Distinguish Organ Quality and Posttransplant Complications.Transplantation direct · 2025Article
- Donor-derived cell-free DNA-based liquid biopsies to determine future kidney transplant rejection.Kidney research and clinical practice · 2025Article
- Circulating cell-free DNA methylation patterns indicate cellular sources of allograft injury after liver transplant.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Circulating, cell-free methylated DNA indicates cellular sources of allograft injury after liver transplant.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Immunology demystified: A guide for transplant hepatologists.World journal of transplantation · 2024Review
- Assessing Donor Liver Quality and Restoring Graft Function in the Era of Extended Criteria Donors.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2023Review
- cGAS-STING pathway in ischemia-reperfusion injury: a potential target to improve transplantation outcomes.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Viability Criteria during Liver Ex-Situ Normothermic and Hypothermic Perfusion.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Review
- Role of Donor-derived Cell-free DNA In Predicting Short-term Allograft Health In Liver Transplant Recipients.Journal of clinical and experimental hepatologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Many risk factors and complications impact the success of liver transplantation, such as ischaemia-reperfusion injury, acute rejection, and primary graft dysfunction. Molecular biomarkers have the potential to accurately diagnose, predict, and monitor injury progression or organ failure. There is a critical opportunity for reliable and non-invasive biomarkers to reduce the organ shortage by enabling i) the assessment of donor organ quality, ii) the monitoring of short- and long-term graft function, and iii) the prediction of acute and chronic disease development. To date, no established molecular biomarkers have been used to guide clinical decision-making in transplantation. In this review, we outline the recent advances in cell-free nucleic acid biomarkers for monitoring graft injury in liver transplant recipients. Prior work in this area can be divided into two categories: biomarker discovery and validation studies. Circulating nucleic acids (CNAs) can be found in the extracellular environment pertaining to different biological fluids such as bile, blood, urine, and perfusate. CNAs that are packaged into extracellular vesicles may facilitate intercellular and interorgan communication. Thus, decoding their biological function, cellular origins and molecular composition is imperative for diagnosing causes of graft injury, guiding immunosuppression and improving overall patient survival. Herein, we discuss the most promising molecular biomarkers, their state of development, and the critical aspects of study design in biomarker research for early detection of post-transplant liver injury. Future advances in biomarker studies are expected to personalise post-transplant therapy, leading to improved patient care and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.