Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35243274›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2022

Characteristics and birth outcomes of pregnant adolescents compared to older women: An analysis of individual level data from 140,000 mothers from 20 RCTs.

Nadia Akseer, Emily Catherine Keats, Pravheen Thurairajah, Simon Cousens, Ana Pilar Bétran, Brietta M Oaks, David Osrin, Ellen Piwoz, Exnevia Gomo, Faruk Ahmed and 17 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
22.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 20 institutions in 13 countries.

Nadia AkseerCentre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 0A4, Canada.
Emily Catherine KeatsCentre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 0A4, Canada.
Pravheen ThurairajahCentre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 0A4, Canada.
Simon CousensLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Ana Pilar BétranWorld Health Organization, Switzerland.
Brietta M OaksUniversity of Rhode Island, United States.
David OsrinInstitute for Global Health, University College London, United Kingdom.
Ellen PiwozThe Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, United States.
Exnevia GomoUniversity of Zimbabwe, Zimbabwe.
Faruk AhmedGriffith University, Australia.
Henrik FriisUniversity of Copenhagen, Denmark.
José BelizánUNC Chapel Hill, United States.
Kathryn DeweyUniversity of California, Davis, United States.
Keith WestJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, United States.
Lieven HuybregtsInternational Food Policy Research Institute, United States.
Lingxia ZengSchool of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Centre, China.
Michael J DibleyThe University of Sydney, Australia.
Noel ZagreUNICEF Regional Office for West and Central Africa, Senegal.
Parul ChristianJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, United States.
Patrick Wilfried KolsterenGhent University, Belgium.
Pernille KaestelUniversity of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Robert E BlackJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, United States.
Shams El ArifeenICDDRB, Bangladesh.
Ulla AshornFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Finland.
Wafaie FawziHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, United States.
Zulfiqar Ahmed BhuttaCentre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 0A4, Canada.
Global Young Women's Nutrition Investigators Group
Hospital for Sick Children · CAJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Copenhagen · DKBill & Melinda Gates Foundation · USGhent University Hospital · BEGriffith University · AUHarvard University · USInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research · BDInternational Food Policy Research Institute · USLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBPublic Health Ontario · CATampere University · FIUniversity College London · GBUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of North Carolina Health Care · USUniversity of Rhode Island · USUniversity of Sydney · AUUniversity of Zimbabwe · ZWWest and Central African Council for Agricultural Research and Development · SNWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdolescence is a critical period of maturation when nutrient needs are high, especially among adolescents entering pregnancy. Using individual-level data from 140,000 participants, we examined socioeconomic, nutrition, and pregnancy and birth outcomes for adolescent mothers (10-19 years) compared to older mothers in low and middle-income countries.

methodsThis study was conducted between March 16, 2018 and May 25, 2021. Data were obtained from 20 randomised controlled trials of micronutrient supplementation in pregnancy. Stratified analyses were conducted by age (10-14 years, 15-17 years, 18-19 years, 20-29 years, 30-39 years, 40+ years) and geographical region (Africa, Asia). Crude and confounder-adjusted means, prevalence and relative risks of pregnancy, nutrition and birth outcomes were estimated using multivariable linear and log-binomial regression models with 95% confidence intervals.

findingsAdolescent mothers comprised 31.6% of our data. Preterm birth, small-for-gestational age (SGA), low birthweight (LBW) and newborn mortality followed a U-shaped trend in which prevalence was highest among the youngest mothers (10-14 years) and then reduced gradually, but increased again for older mothers (40+ years). When compared to mothers aged 20-29 years, there was a 23% increased risk of preterm birth, a 60% increased risk of perinatal mortality, a 63% increased risk of neonatal mortality, a 28% increased risk of LBW, and a 22% increased risk of SGA among mothers 10-14 years. Mothers 40+ years experienced a 22% increased risk of preterm birth and a 103% increased risk of stillbirth when compared to the 20-29 year group.

interpretationThe youngest and oldest mothers suffer most from adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes. Policy and programming agendas should consider both biological and socioeconomic/environmental factors when targeting these populations.

fundingBill and Melinda Gates Foundation (Grant No: OP1137750).

Indexed as

AdolescenceAgeBirth outcomesDeterminantsPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID35243274
PMCPMC8885463
OpenAlexW4220849952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.