Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35243237›Full record

ReviewiScience2022

Sex disparities in DNA damage response pathways: Novel determinants in cancer formation and therapy.

Miriana Cardano, Giacomo Buscemi, Laura Zannini

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in iScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Integrative Omics Reveal Female-Specific Benefits of p16Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Miriana CardanoIstituto di Genetica Molecolare Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (IGM-CNR), Pavia, Italy.
Giacomo BuscemiIstituto di Genetica Molecolare Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (IGM-CNR), Pavia, Italy.
Laura ZanniniIstituto di Genetica Molecolare Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (IGM-CNR), Pavia, Italy.
Istituto di Genetica Molecolare · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer incidence and survival are different between men and women. Indeed, females have a lesser risk and a better prognosis than males in many tumors unrelated to reproductive functions. Although the reasons for these disparities are still unknown, they constitute an important starting point for the development of personalized cancer therapies. One of the mechanisms that fuels carcinogenesis is the accumulation of defects in DNA damage response (DDR) pathways, a complex signaling cascade that senses DNA lesions and, depending on the severity, coordinates transient cell-cycle arrest, DNA replication, repair, apoptosis, and senescence, preventing genomic instability and cancer. Recently, evidence of sexual dimorphisms is emerging in these pathways, therefore providing new opportunities for precision medicine. Here, we will discuss current knowledge about sexual disparities in the DDR, their role in tumorigenesis and cancer progression, and the importance of considering sex contribution in both research and cancer therapies.

Indexed as

CancerCell biologyCellular physiology

Identifiers

PMID35243237
PMCPMC8858993
OpenAlexW4210794863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.