ArticleiScience2022
Dissociation of spatial and object memory in the hippocampal formation of Japanese quail.
Article in iScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Novel object recognition in the dorsomedial and ventral hippocampus of young domestic chicks (Gallus gallus).Brain structure & function · 2026Article
- Anesthetic and analgesic management of Svalbard rock ptarmigan (Lagopus muta hyperborea) undergoing experimental stereotaxic neurosurgery.BMC veterinary research · 2025Article
- Spatial neophobia is still not correlated with object neophobia in wild-caught house sparrows (Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- Dim artificial light at night alters immediate early gene expression throughout the avian brain.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Experience-DependentFrontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Article
- Spatial cognition and the avian hippocampus: Research in domestic chicks.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Review
- Seeing the Forest for the Trees, and the Ground Below My Beak: Global and Local Processing in the Pigeon's Visual System.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The mammalian temporal cortex can be functionally segregated into regions that encode spatial information and others that are predominantly responsible for object recognition. In the present study, we report comparable functional segregation in the avian brain. Using Japanese quail, we find that bilateral lesions of the hippocampus (Hp) produce robust deficits in performance in a foraging array (FA) spatial memory task, while sparing spontaneous object recognition (SOR). In contrast, lesions to the adjacent area parahippocampalis (APH) compromise both SOR and FA. These observations demonstrate a functional dissociation between Hp and APH that is comparable to the distinctions seen in mammals between the hippocampus and surrounding temporal cortex.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.