ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports2022
Endophthalmitis outbreak caused by Fusarium oxysporum after cataract surgery.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology case reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhanced pathogen identification in fungal endophthalmitis by metagenomic next-generation sequencing: a retrospective clinical evaluation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Molecular Identification and Antifungal Susceptibility of Fusarium spp. Clinical Isolates.Mycoses · 2025Article
- Infection prevention and control factors associated with post-cataract surgery endophthalmitis - a review of the literature from 2010 - 2023.Infection prevention in practice · 2024Review
- EndogenousVision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Outbreaks of Fungal Infections in Hospitals: Epidemiology, Detection, and Management.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Biosynthesis of Novel Tellurium Nanorods byMicroorganisms · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate an outbreak of endophthalmitis caused by
methodsIn the present study, we conducted a retrospective review of the medical records of cases of endophthalmitis that developed after cataract surgery. All eyes underwent phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation (PEA + IOL) at a single eye clinic on the same date. Symptoms of endophthalmitis occurred 21.5 ± 3.4 days after the cataract surgery.
resultsNine eyes of 9 patients with fungal endophthalmitis (5 males and 4 females) were enrolled in the current study. The mean age of the patients was 63.4 ± 8.5 years. Soon after the diagnosis of endophthalmitis, pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) had been performed in all the eyes. However, because there was no response to the first PPV plus antibacterial drug therapy, we performed repeat PPV for all the eyes, combined with IOL removal and antifungal therapy (natamycin eye drops plus oral voriconazole or fosfluconazole). After the antifungal drug therapy, no recurrence of endophthalmitis was observed in any of the operated eyes, and good visual outcomes were obtained.
conclusionEarly diagnosis and appropriate, adequate treatment are needed for successful management of fungal endophthalmitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.