Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35242985›Full record

ReviewJPRAS open2022

Thromboelastography in Microsurgical Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

M Thakkar, A Rose, B Bednarz

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JPRAS open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Clot Waveform Analysis for Hemostatic Abnormalities.Annals of laboratory medicine · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Detection of a Prethrombotic State in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Using a Clot Waveform Analysis.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
  7. Clinical Application of Clot Waveform Analysis.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

M ThakkarDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, St Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, London, W2 1NY.
A RoseDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, 84 Castle Street, Glasgow, G4 0SF.
B BednarzDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Southmead Hospital, Southmead Road BS10 5NB.
Glasgow Royal Infirmary · GBSouthmead Hospital · GBSt Mary's Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this review was to identify studies that used thromboelastography (TEG) or rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) in microsurgical free flap reconstruction and analyse whether it is a useful adjunct at predicting and identifying thrombotic complications. A search was conducted using the MEDLINE database using the keywords "thromboelastogram", "TEG", "thromboelastography", "free flaps" and "free tissue transfer" using a two-component search with the Boolean operators "OR" and "AND". Eight studies were retrieved using the search criteria. Seven studies met the inclusion criteria, and a further study was found citing several articles from the initial search. Combined, there were 528 patients who underwent 600 free flaps. A total of 10.3% (62) arterial and venous thromboses were reported in the studies, and the combined flap failure rate was 5.2% (26). A total of 67% (4/6) of the studies supported the use of TEG as a predictive tool to detect thromboses, including three retrospective case series and one prospective cohort, which were all statistically significant. There is low-quality evidence (level IV) that a pre-operative TEG and functional fibrinogen to platelet ratio of ≥42 can identify patients at risk of adverse post-operative thrombotic events following free flap surgery; however, further validation is required. Higher quality, standardised prospective or randomised control trials are required to further evaluate the predictive value of TEG. As a pre-operative screening tool, TEG can help to detect pathological changes in coagulation, aid in the transfusion of blood products, target anticoagulation therapy and predict possible adverse events aiding to further reduce patient morbidity.

Indexed as

Free flapsFree tissue transferMicrosurgical reconstructionROTEMTEGThromboelastographyThromboelastometry

Identifiers

PMID35242985
PMCPMC8857410
OpenAlexW4206554744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.