ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022
Application of microbiological rapid on-site evaluation in respiratory intensive care units: a retrospective study.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pathogen spectrum of pulmonary infections in kidney transplant recipients and the diagnostic value of mNGS: a sputum and BALF study based on clinical decision-making.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Clinical features of influenza-associated pulmonary aspergillosis: a retrospective multicenter cohort study.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- Solving the diagnostic dilemma in bone infections: metagenomic next generation sequencing enhances pathogen identification accuracy.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- A Clinical Bacterial Dataset for Deep Learning in Microbiological Rapid On-Site Evaluation.Scientific data · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo analyze the clinical value of microbiological rapid on-site evaluation (M-ROSE) in the respiratory intensive care unit (RICU) and its impact on the prognosis of critically ill patients.
methodsWe retrospectively included patients who underwent bedside bronchoalveolar lavage in the RICU of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital between January 2017 and December 2020. The patients were divided into M-ROSE and control groups according to whether bedside M-ROSE was performed with to guide the treatment, and for control group, routine treatments were administrated based on all the clinical information. The basic information, treatment methods, test indicators, and prognostic evaluation of the patients were collected and analyzed.
resultsA total of 242 patients were enrolled, including 130 patients in the M-ROSE group and 112 patients in the control group. The inflammatory indicators of the patients in the M-ROSE group decreased significantly faster after admission than those of patients in the control group, and the patients in the M-ROSE group used significantly more types of antibiotics [5 (3.0, 5.0)] than those in the control group [3 (2.0, 4.0)] (P<0.05). Among the patients who were on invasive mechanical ventilation, the mortality rate of the M-ROSE group was significantly lower than that of the control group (P<0.05). The coincidence rate of the M-ROSE results with metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) results was 66.2%, which was higher than the coincidence rate of other laboratory results. In addition, the M-ROSE reports were available significantly faster than the smear, culture, and mNGS results.
conclusionsM-ROSE has high diagnostic value for lower respiratory tract pathogens. The application of M-ROSE in the RICU can help to promote a decrease in patients' inflammation levels and reduce the mortality of patients on invasive mechanical ventilation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.