Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35242714›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Functional Bowel Complaints and the Impact on Quality of Life After Colorectal Cancer Surgery in the Elderly.

Stijn H J Ketelaers, Maarten van Heinsbergen, Ricardo G Orsini, F Jeroen Vogelaar, Joop L M Konsten, Grard A P Nieuwenhuijzen, Harm J T Rutten, Jacobus W A Burger, Johanne G Bloemen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. SEOM-GEMCAD-TTD clinical guidelines for localized rectal cancer (2025).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Observational
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Stijn H J KetelaersDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Maarten van HeinsbergenDepartment of Surgery, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, Netherlands.
Ricardo G OrsiniDepartment of Surgery, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands.
F Jeroen VogelaarDepartment of Surgery, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, Netherlands.
Joop L M KonstenDepartment of Surgery, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, Netherlands.
Grard A P NieuwenhuijzenDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Harm J T RuttenDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Jacobus W A BurgerDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Johanne G BloemenDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLVieCuri Medisch Centrum · NLCatharina Ziekenhuis · NLElisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) is commonly reported after colorectal cancer surgery and significantly impairs quality of life. The prevalence and impact of LARS in the elderly after rectal cancer as well as colon cancer surgery is unclear. We aimed to describe the prevalence of LARS complaints and the impact on quality of life in the elderly after colorectal cancer surgery. MATERIALS AND

methodsPatients were included from seven Dutch hospitals if they were at least one year after they underwent colorectal cancer surgery between 2008 and 2015. Functional bowel complaints were assessed by the LARS score. Quality of life was assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-CR29 questionnaires. Outcomes in patients ≥70 years were compared to a reference group of patients <70 years.

resultsIn total 440 rectal cancer and 1183 colon cancer patients were eligible for analyses, of whom 133 (30.2%) rectal and 536 (45.3%) colon cancer patients were ≥70 years. Major LARS was reported by 40.6% of rectal cancer and 22.2% of colon cancer patients ≥70 years. In comparison, patients <70 years reported major LARS in 57.3% after rectal cancer surgery (p=0.001) and in 20.4% after colon cancer surgery (p=0.41). Age ≥70 years was independently associated with reduced rates of major LARS after rectal cancer surgery (OR 0.63,

conclusionElderly should not be withheld a restorative colorectal cancer resection based on age alone. However, a substantial part of the elderly colorectal cancer patients develops major LARS after surgery, which often severely impairs quality of life. Since elderly frequently consider quality of life and functional outcomes as one of the most important outcomes after treatment, major LARS and its impact on quality of life should be incorporated in the decision-making process.

Indexed as

bowel dysfunctioncolorectal cancerelderlyfunctional outcomeslow anterior resection syndromepatient reported outcome measure (PRO)quality of lifesurgery

Identifiers

PMID35242714
PMCPMC8886503
OpenAlexW4211005632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.