ArticleGland surgery2022
Influence of progesterone receptor on metastasis and prognosis in breast cancer patients with negative HER-2.
Article in Gland surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- A phase II study of a doublet metronomic chemotherapy regimen consisting of oral vinorelbine and capecitabine in Chinese women with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.Thoracic cancer · 2023Trial
- Retrospective Case-Cohort Study on Risk Factors for Developing Distant Metastases in Women With Breast Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Risk factors and survival of triple-negative breast cancer among breast cancer patients: Ten-year cross-sectional study in the southwestern Iranian population.Health science reports · 2023Article
- Single progesterone receptor-positive phenotype has the similar clinicopathological features and outcome as triple-negative subtype in metastatic breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn
methodsUsing the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2015.We analyzed the metastatic patterns and prognosis of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2)-negative breast cancer patients. Cox analysis was used to analyze the influence of ER+/PR- and ER-/PR+ on the prognosis of patients in different subgroups and the risk factors affecting the prognosis of patients with single hormone receptor positivity.
resultsWe included 206,187 breast cancer patients, including 7,726 stage IV patients. The loss of ER was a protective factor against bone metastasis (P<0.001) and a risk factor for visceral metastasis (P<0.001). The ER-/PR+ subtype had a similar proportion of
conclusionsER-/PR+ subtype had a high proportion of stage IV patients. Meanwhile, such subtype breast cancer had similar clinicopathological characteristics, metastatic models (prefers to visceral metastasis), similar even worse prognosis compared with TNBC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.