ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2022
Systematic review and meta-analysis on laparoscopic cystectomy in bladder cancer.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparing surgical site wound infection after laparoscopic and open radical cystectomies in patients with bladder cancer.International wound journal · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy evaluation of urethral dragging-and-adhesion anastomosis in ileal orthotopic neobladder reconstruction following laparoscopic radical cystectomy: a dual-center retrospective study.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- "Minho Technique" for Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy with Intracorporeal Ileal Conduit.Urology research & practice · 2024Article
- Review
- Laparoscopic radical cystectomy could be used in the clinical surgical treatment of bladder cancer patients.Translational andrology and urology · 2022Article
- Systematic review and meta-analysis on laparoscopic cystectomy in bladder cancer: reply letter.Translational andrology and urology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) surgical therapy in patients with bladder cancer (BC), and to provide evidence for the clinical treatment of BC.
methodsThe Embase, Ovid, PubMed, Medline, Springer, and Web of Sciences database were searched to screen articles with clinical controlled trials on LRC treatment of BC. The Cochrane Handbook 5.0.2 software and Review Manager 5.3 software were adopted to evaluate the risk of bias and to perform a meta-analysis of the included articles in this study.
resultsA total of 12 articles were obtained, including 1,283 research cases. The meta-analysis results showed that relative to the control group (Ctrl), the observation group (Observ group) had significantly lower intraoperative blood loss (IBL) after LRC [mean difference (MD) =-458.75; 95% confidential interval (CI): -505.75 to -411.76; Z=19.13; P<0.00001], blood transfusion rate (BTR) (odds ratio =0.36; 95% CI: 0.13-0.94; Z=2.08; and P=0.04), use of analgesics (MD =-24.53; 95% CI: -39.04 to -10.01; Z=3.31; and P=0.0009), and incidence of postoperative complications (Risk ratio =0.58; 95% CI: 0.39-0.85; Z=2.77; and P=0.006). However, and the length of hospital stay could not be shortened (MD =-2.43; 95% CI: -4.83 to -0.02; Z=1.98; and P=0.05). DISCUSSION: LRC treatment of BC could effectively reduce the amount of IBS, and lower the intraoperative BTR, use of analgesics, and incidence of postoperative complications. Therefore, it could be used in the clinical surgical treatment of BC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.