ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2022
Deep Learning Accurately Quantifies Plasma Cell Percentages on CD138-Stained Bone Marrow Samples.
Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence in small tissue biopsies: diagnostic applications, histochemical integration, and methodological challenges in surgical pathology.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2026Review
- Advancements in bone marrow biopsy: the role of omics and artificial intelligence in hematologic diagnostics.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Deep learning in bone marrow cytomorphology: advances in segmentation, classification, and clinical translation.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Bone Marrow Histological Diagnostics: Potential Applications and Challenges.Pathobiology : journal of immunopathology, molecular and cellular biology · 2024Review
- Advances in estimating plasma cells in bone marrow: A comprehensive method review.African journal of laboratory medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The diagnosis of plasma cell neoplasms requires accurate, and ideally precise, percentages. This plasma cell percentage is often determined by visual estimation of CD138-stained bone marrow biopsies and clot sections. While not necessarily inaccurate, estimates are by definition imprecise. For this study, we hypothesized that deep learning can be used to improve precision. We trained a semantic segmentation-based convolutional neural network (CNN) using annotations of CD138+ and CD138- cells provided by one pathologist on small image patches of bone marrow and validated the CNN on an independent test set of image patches using annotations from two pathologists and a non-deep learning commercial software. On validation, we found that the intraclass correlation coefficients for plasma cell percentages between the CNN and pathologist #1, a non-deep learning commercial software and pathologist #1, and pathologists #1 and #2 were 0.975, 0.892, and 0.994, respectively. The overall results show that CNN labels were almost as accurate as pathologist labels at a cell-by-cell level. Once satisfied with performance, we scaled-up the CNN to evaluate whole slide images (WSIs), and deployed the system as a workflow friendly web application to measure plasma cell percentages using snapshots taken from microscope cameras.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.