Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35242447›Full record

ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2022

Neural Network Assisted Pathology Case Identification.

Jerome Cheng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Applications of Large Language Models in Pathology.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jerome ChengDepartment of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraditionally, cases for cohort selection and quality assurance purposes are identified through structured query language (SQL) searches matching specific keywords. Recently, several neural network-based natural language processing (NLP) pipelines have emerged as an accurate alternative/complementary method for case retrieval.

methodsThe diagnosis section of 1000 pathology reports with the terms "colon" and "carcinoma" were retrieved from our laboratory information system through a SQL query. Each of the reports were labeled as either positive or negative, where cases are considered positive if the case was a primary adenocarcinoma of the colon. Negative cases comprised adenocarcinoma from other sites, metastatic adenocarcinomas, benign conditions, rectal cancers, and other cases that do not fit in the primary colonic adenocarcinoma category. The 1000 cases were randomly separated into training, validation, and holdout sets. A convolutional neural network (CNN) model built using Keras (a neural network library) was trained to identify positive cases, and the model was applied to the holdout set to predict the category for each case.

resultsThe CNN model classified 141 out of 149 primary colonic adenocarcinoma cases, and 43 out of 51 negative cases correctly, achieving an accuracy of 92% and area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.957.

conclusionTrained convolutional neural network models by itself, or as an adjunct to keyword and pattern-based text extraction methods may be used to search for pathology cases of interest with high accuracy.

Indexed as

Laboratory information systemNatural language processingNeural networkStructured query languageWord embedding

Identifiers

PMID35242447
PMCPMC8860736
OpenAlexW4226231938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.