Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35242370›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2022

Clinical assessment of efficacy of poly-L-lactide sternal pin on sternal stability and post-operative pain: a prospective randomized trial in cardiovascular surgery.

Shingo Takahara, Konosuke Sasaki, Takeshi Saito, Kei Sakuma, Hidenori Fujiwara, Ichiro Yoshioka, Kiichiro Kumagai, Wenyu Sun, Kei Takase, Yoshikatsu Saiki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shingo TakaharaDivision of Cardiovascular Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Konosuke SasakiDivision of Cardiovascular Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Takeshi SaitoDivision of Cardiovascular Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Kei SakumaDivision of Cardiovascular Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Hidenori FujiwaraDivision of Cardiovascular Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Ichiro YoshiokaDivision of Cardiovascular Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Kiichiro KumagaiResearch Division of Science for Aortic diseases, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Wenyu SunDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Kei TakaseDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Yoshikatsu SaikiDivision of Cardiovascular Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough the incident rate is low, sternal dislocation and dehiscence due to unstable sternal fixation after cardiovascular surgery could cause potentially lethal complications. Thus, to enforce the stability of closed sternum, the sternal pins have been utilized at surgeon's discretion. However, there is no randomized clinical trial to test whether these pins are effective to stabilize a sternum. Hence, this study aimed to examine the clinical efficacy of bioabsorbable poly-L-lactide (PLLA) sternal pins in reinforcing sternal stability and preventing instability of the sternum after full sternotomy.

methodsWe conducted a single institutional, prospective, randomized, single-blinded clinical study involving 100 patients who underwent an initial cardiovascular surgery via sternotomy. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups: with (group P) and without (group N) PLLA sternal pins, at 1:1 ratio from November 2013 to April 2016. Sternal deviation and stability were assessed with postoperative computed tomography (CT) at two postures to put shear stress on the sternum. Additionally, information on patient demographic indices was obtained prospectively, and patient's pain intensity was assessed with numerical rating scoring system during rehabilitation. Furthermore, propensity score matching was performed for further comparative sub-analysis.

resultsNinety-one patients (43 in group P and 48 in group N) were analyzed using the intention-to-treat method. Group N had a significantly higher proportion of males (P=0.015) and ischemic disease as a primary diagnosis (P=0.040) than group P. Postoperative CT showed that the degree of sternal deviation and stability were comparable between the groups. Similarly, the numerical rating score of pain during rehabilitation showed no difference between the groups. Even after adjusting for patient characteristics using propensity score matching method, no significant differences in sternal gaps, stability, and numerical rating score of pain were observed. Of note, no material-related adverse event such as wound infection was found.

conclusionsWe could not identify the efficacy of the sternal pin in enforcing sternal stability based on CT measurements with mild shear stress on sternum after cardiovascular surgery. Nevertheless, our results with no adverse events might encourage further investigations with a more specific cohort who is susceptible to infection but requires an additional sternal fixation.

trial registrationThis study was registered in University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN000017357).

Indexed as

Cardiovascular surgerypoly-L-lactide sternal pins (PLLA sternal pins)post-operative painrandomized trialsternal fixation

Identifiers

PMID35242370
PMCPMC8828521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.