ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2022
Accuracy of multidetector computed tomography with maximum intensity projection technique in the assessment of fissure integrity.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) is a potential treatment for patients with severe emphysema, performed through the placement of unidirectional endobronchial valves (EBVs). Their benefits are only achieved in patients that significantly reduce lobar volume, and it is mandatory that the fissures are complete. Fissure evaluation is preferably done by computed tomography, but little is known if its evaluation corresponds to the anatomical findings. The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of thoracic radiologists in the identification of complete fissures by multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) using maximum intensity projection (MIP) technique, compared with direct anatomical evaluation.
methodsProspective study, conducted in a single institution. Patients submitted to thoracic surgery had their fissures classified as complete or incomplete by thoracic surgeons and their preoperative chest scans evaluated by three radiologists, blinded for surgical evaluation. With the intraoperative categorization as a reference, the accuracy and concordance of the three thoracic radiologists' evaluation were calculated. The most experienced radiologist evaluated the fissures at two different moments to estimate the intra-observer agreement.
resultsThere were included 67 patients, being 37 (55%) males, with a mean age of 64 years. The accuracy of radiological identification of complete fissures ranged from 76.8% for left posterior oblique fissure to 85.1% for left anterior oblique fissure, with the best performance achieved by the most experienced radiologist. The concordance of the radiological evaluation for fissure integrity compared to the surgical assessment (k) was 0.53-0.68. Intra-observer agreement ranged from 0.74 to 0.87.
conclusionsThe evaluation of the fissure integrity by MDCT analysis using MIP technique by thoracic radiologists had high accuracy among the thoracic radiologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.