ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2022
Transit time flow measurement and outcome in coronary artery bypass grafting for surgeon and trainee.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTrainees need to operate under appropriate supervision to become competent. Transit time flow measurement (TTFM) is useful in detecting intraoperative graft failures during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). This study aims to compare the intra- and postoperative outcomes, including TTFM, of isolated CABG performed by a single consultant versus trainees and to determine the relationship between the pulsatility index (PI) and postoperative outcomes.
methodsThis retrospective study included 155 isolated CABG cases. Intraoperative outcomes included duration of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and aortic cross-clamp and TTFM for arterial and venous grafts. Postoperative outcomes included common postoperative complications and mortality. The odds ratios of postoperative complications and mortality for arterial and venous grafts with PI ≤3 relative to grafts with PI >3 were determined with multiple logistic regression.
resultsThe duration of CPB and aortic cross-clamp was significantly shorter in the consultant's group. TTFM for both arterial and venous grafts were similar and no significant differences in postoperative complications and mortality were detected between the two groups. Patients with arterial grafts with PI ≤3 were less likely to require an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) or be ventilated for a prolonged period. No significant differences in postoperative outcomes and mortality were detected between venous grafts with PI ≤3 and PI >3.
conclusionsTrainees can achieve good results in isolated CABG with appropriate case selection. Patients with arterial grafts with PI ≤3 have better postoperative outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.