Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35242300›Full record

ArticleVeterinary medicine international2022

Antimicrobial Usage in Smallholder Poultry Production in Nigeria.

Oladeji Bamidele, Tunde A Amole, Oluwafikayo A Oyewale, Olayinka O Bamidele, Abdulmojeed Yakubu, Uduak E Ogundu, Folasade O Ajayi, Waheed A Hassan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary medicine international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Antimicrobial usage in broiler poultry farms in Zambia.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Antimicrobial resistance profiles ofJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Oladeji BamideleInternational Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), P.M.B. 5320, Ibadan 200001, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2125-5390
Tunde A AmoleInternational Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), P.M.B. 5320, Ibadan 200001, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0686-4913
Oluwafikayo A OyewaleAfrican Centre of Excellence for Genomics of Infectious Diseases, Redeemer's University, Ede, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3532-2635
Olayinka O BamideleFaculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1426-9812
Abdulmojeed YakubuDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Nasarawa State University, Keffi, Shabu-Lafia Campus Lafia, Nasarawa State, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0700-9361
Uduak E OgunduDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Federal University of Technology, Owerri, Imo State, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9273-0550
Folasade O AjayiDepartment of Animal Science, University of Port-Harcourt, Choba, Rivers State, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6457-882X
Waheed A HassanDepartment of Animal Science, Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Sokoto, Sokoto State, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7655-2328
Hebrew University of Jerusalem · ILFederal University of Technology Owerri · NGInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture · NGNasarawa State University · NGRedeemer's University · NGUniversity of Port Harcourt · NGUsmanu Danfodiyo University · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The indiscriminate use of antimicrobials in livestock production is of increasing concern due to the threat of antimicrobial resistance in both humans and animals. Much emphasis has been placed on intensively managed poultry production systems, which routinely use antimicrobials as against smallholder poultry production systems (SPPS). Therefore, this study investigated the use of antimicrobials among smallholder poultry farmers in Nigeria, and compared the prevalence of antimicrobial drug use against the practice of ethnoveterinary medicine (EVM). A cross-sectional study was conducted in five states (agroecologies) of Nigeria using structured questionnaires administered on a total of 350 farmers. The practice of EVM was prevalent among most of the farmers (39%). The western method (pharmaceuticals) was practiced by a large proportion of farmers (60%), either solely (25%) or in combination with EVM (35%). Antimicrobials were used primarily for treatment and prevention of diseases (78%). Semi-scavenging system of production had the highest proportion (49%) of farmers using antimicrobials, compared to semi-intensive (37%) and scavenging (14%) systems. Gender (

Identifiers

PMID35242300
PMCPMC8886695
OpenAlexW4214620359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.