ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022
Analysis of Clinical Effect after Treatment of Patients with Femoral Neck Fracture Using Total or Hemihip Arthroplasty.
Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Retracted: Analysis of Clinical Effect after Treatment of Patients with Femoral Neck Fracture Using Total or Hemihip Arthroplasty.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2022-12-28Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Objections by Author(s) ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the difference in clinical outcomes between total hip arthroplasty (THA) and hemiarthroplasty (HA) in patients with femoral neck fracture.
methodTo retrospectively analyze 96 patients (96 hips) with femoral neck fracture treated in our hospital and distinguish them into THA group (50 patients with 50 hips) and HA group (46 patients with 46 hips) according to the difference of their chosen surgical procedure, and to compare the difference in perioperative indexes, postoperative hip function, occurrence of near and long-term complications, long-term imaging performance, and revision rate between the two groups.
resultThe operating time, intraoperative blood loss, and total drainage were greater in the THA group than in the HA group (
conclusionCompared with hemiarthroplasty, total hip arthroplasty has a longer operative time and more postoperative bleeding, but the complication rate is relatively lower in the long term, and the patients have better long-term hip function recovery, so total hip arthroplasty is recommended for patients with femoral neck fracture with an expected survival time longer than 3 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.