ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022
Predicting Protein-Protein Interactions via Random Ferns with Evolutionary Matrix Representation.
Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of theCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
- Graph and Hypergraph Theories Applied to Dynamic Protein-Protein Interaction Network Analysis, and Deep-Learning Frameworks for Protein Complex Network Prediction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- An efficient framework for protein-protein interaction prediction by integrating stacked denoising autoencoders and random ferns.iScience · 2026Article
- Predicting protein-protein interactions in microbes associated with cardiovascular diseases using deep denoising autoencoders and evolutionary information.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Exploring the relationship between immune heterogeneity characteristic genes of rheumatoid arthritis and acute myeloid leukemia.Discover oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) play a crucial role in understanding disease pathogenesis, genetic mechanisms, guiding drug design, and other biochemical processes, thus, the identification of PPIs is of great importance. With the rapid development of high-throughput sequencing technology, a large amount of PPIs sequence data has been accumulated. Researchers have designed many experimental methods to detect PPIs by using these sequence data, hence, the prediction of PPIs has become a research hotspot in proteomics. However, since traditional experimental methods are both time-consuming and costly, it is difficult to analyze and predict the massive amount of PPI data quickly and accurately. To address these issues, many computational systems employing machine learning knowledge were widely applied to PPIs prediction, thereby improving the overall recognition rate. In this paper, a novel and efficient computational technology is presented to implement a protein interaction prediction system using only protein sequence information. First, the Position-Specific Iterated Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (PSI-BLAST) was employed to generate a position-specific scoring matrix (PSSM) containing protein evolutionary information from the initial protein sequence. Second, we used a novel data processing feature representation scheme, MatFLDA, to extract the essential information of PSSM for protein sequences and obtained five training and five testing datasets by adopting a five-fold cross-validation method. Finally, the random fern (RFs) classifier was employed to infer the interactions among proteins, and a model called MatFLDA_RFs was developed. The proposed MatFLDA_RFs model achieved good prediction performance with 95.03% average accuracy on
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.