ArticleNature physics2021
Clonal dominance in excitable cell networks.
Article in Nature physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Implementation of Web-Based Respondent-Driven Sampling to Recruit Users of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems in Brazil: Cross-Sectional Survey.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Resolving the design principles that control post-natal vascular growth and scaling.Cell systems · 2025Article
- A model of replicating coupled oscillators generates naturally occurring cell networks.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2023Article
- Fusome topology and inheritance during insect gametogenesis.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Temporal signals drive the emergence of multicellular information networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Mechanics of stabilized intercellular bridges.Biophysical journal · 2022Article
- Non-neutral clonal selection and its potential role in mammalian germline stem cell dysfunction with advancing age.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clonal dominance arises when the descendants (clones) of one or a few founder cells contribute disproportionally to the final structure during collective growth [1-8]. In contexts such as bacterial growth, tumorigenesis, and stem cell reprogramming [2-4], this phenomenon is often attributed to pre-existing propensities for dominance, while in stem cell homeostasis, neutral drift dynamics are invoked [5,6]. The mechanistic origin of clonal dominance during development, where it is increasingly documented [1,6-8], is less understood. Here, we investigate this phenomenon in the
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.