ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022
Classification of Breast Cancer Images by Implementing Improved DCNN with Artificial Fish School Model.
Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A novel breast cancer image classification model based on multiscale texture feature analysis and dynamic learning.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Attention-Based Deep Learning System for Classification of Breast Lesions-Multimodal, Weakly Supervised Approach.Cancers · 2023Article
- Retracted: Classification of Breast Cancer Images by Implementing Improved DCNN with Artificial Fish School Model.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2023Article
- Biomedical Diagnosis of Breast Cancer Using Deep Learning and Multiple Classifiers.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- PSOWNNs-CNN: A Computational Radiology for Breast Cancer Diagnosis Improvement Based on Image Processing Using Machine Learning Methods.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-07-26Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer is an important factor affecting human health. This issue has various diagnosis process which were evolved such as mammography, fine needle aspirate, and surgical biopsy. These techniques use pathological breast cancer images for diagnosis. Breast cancer surgery allows the forensic doctor to histologist to access the microscopic level of breast tissues. The conventional method uses an optimized radial basis neural network using a cuckoo search algorithm. Existing radial basis neural network techniques utilized feature extraction and reduction parts separately. It is proposed that it overcomes the CNN approach for all the feature extraction and classification process to reduce time complexity. In this proposed method, a convolutional neural network is proposed based on an artificial fish school algorithm. The breast cancer image dataset is taken from cancer imaging archives. In the preprocessing step of classification, the breast cancer image is filtered with the support of a wiener filter for classification. The convolutional neural network has set the intense data of an image and is used to remove the features. After executing the extraction procedure, the reduction process is performed to speed up the train and test data processing. Here, the artificial fish school optimization algorithm is utilized to give the direct training data to the deep convolutional neural network. The extraction, reduction, and classification of features are utilized in the single deep convolutional neural network process. In this process, the optimization technique helps to decrease the error rate and increases the performance efficiency by finding the number of epochs and training images to the Deep CNN. In this system, the normal, benign, and malignant tissues are predicted. By comparing the existing RBF technique with the cuckoo search algorithm, the presented model attains the outcome in the way of sensitivity, accuracy, specificity, F1 score, and recall.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.