Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35241987›Full record

ArticleThe journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG2022

Comparison of Two Morphine Dosing Strategies in the Management of Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome.

John Brock Harris, Amy P Holmes

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

John Brock HarrisWingate University School of Pharmacy (JBH), Wingate University, Wingate, NC.
Amy P HolmesBrenner Children's Hospital (APH), Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC.
Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist · USWingate University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe incidence of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) has increased in recent years. Treatment approaches usually involve opioid replacement; however, the optimal treatment strategy is unknown. This study sought to determine the impact of weight- and symptom-based morphine dosing strategies on LOS and medication exposure in patients with NAS.

methodsA retrospective review was conducted from May 2015 to June 2017 at 2 NICUs within a health-system using different dosing approaches for NAS. Data were compared using Fisher exact tests for categorical data and

resultsBaseline demographics were well-matched except for postmenstrual age at morphine initiation (p = 0.04). The weight-based group had a larger initial morphine dose (p < 0.001) and fewer number of steps to maximum morphine dose (p = 0.009). There were no differences between groups in LOS, number of dose adjustments, doses administered, weaning steps, maximum dose, or need to re-escalate dosing. There was also no difference between the first 3 modified Finnegan scores (MFS) after transferring patients to a neonatology service. Neonates with symptom-based dosing had a higher maximum MFS (p = 0.024). Neonates in the symptom-based group required adjunct therapy more often (p < 0.0001).

conclusionsData indicate the dosing strategy impacts number of steps to reach maximum dose and need for adjunctive therapy. Weight-based dosing may decrease the number of steps required to reach the morphine maximum dose and the need for adjunctive therapy by controlling NAS symptoms earlier.

Indexed as

morphineNASneonatal abstinence syndromewithdrawal

Identifiers

PMID35241987
PMCPMC8837209
OpenAlexW4211016073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.