Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35241943›Full record

ArticleJournal of healthcare leadership2022

The Physician on a Board of Directors: Bane or Benefit?

Malke Borow, Baruch Levi, Benny Avissar, Leah Wapner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of healthcare leadership, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Malke BorowIsraeli Medical Association, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Baruch LeviIsraeli Medical Association, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Benny AvissarIsraeli Medical Association, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Leah WapnerIsraeli Medical Association, Ramat Gan, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the accelerated development of innovative domains such as artificial intelligence, big data, and personalized healthcare, the continuing growth of health-tech and bio-tech industries is to be expected. Concurrently, the question of the extent and nature of physicians' involvement in these rapidly evolving industries arises, especially in management and leadership capacities such as directors or chief executive officers of such companies. Against this backdrop, the Israeli Medical Association recently launched a first-of-its-kind course designed to train senior physicians as directors in health-tech companies by providing them with vast relevant financial, legislative, and professional proficiencies. Due to their medical knowledge and clinical experience, physicians bring a substantial added value to these industries. However, considering the inherent tensions and potential conflicts between adhering to the logic of a profit-making, competitive market on one hand and maintaining the doctor's oath on the other, it is inevitable that dilemmas and difficulties will emerge. Much has been written about the roles and responsibilities of boards of directors, but to date, little has focused on the unique position of physicians who serve in these roles. This article aims to examine the ways in which conflicts or dualities of interest manifest themselves for physicians who assume roles as directors and whether effective remedial strategies are available, based on the authors' own experience in the initiation of the IMA physician-directors course.

Indexed as

biotechnologydirectorshealth technologyleadershipmanagementmedical ethicsphysicians

Identifiers

PMID35241943
PMCPMC8886151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.