ArticleJournal of orthopaedics
Evaluation of functional outcome and neurological recovery pattern in patients with retro-thecal tubercular epidural abscess managed at a tertiary center.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We performed a retrospective observational study to analyze the neurological recovery pattern in patients with a sub-laminar retro-thecal epidural abscess managed at our tertiary apex center from 2014 to 2020. We evaluated the Maximal Spinal Cord Compression (MSCC) ratio on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), the time interval between the appearance of neurological deficit and the initiation of management, spasticity as per Modified Ashworth Scale, presence of drug resistance, and the Lower Extremity Motor Score (LEMS). All patients were given anti-tubercular chemotherapy. We surgically managed 8 patients of which 6 required decompression alone, while 2 patients required additional instrumentation. 2 patients were managed conservatively of which 1 responded favorably to conservative treatment while the other patient showed a worsening of neurology following the detection of drug resistance and abrupt discontinuation of chemotherapy. The mean LEMS on admission was 20.2, which improved to 38.5 at the end of 1 year (p-value <0.05). The patients in whom the time interval between the onset of neurological deficit and the initiation of management was fewer than 6 weeks showed better LEMS and milder or absent spasticity at follow-up (p-value <0.05). The MSCC ratio did not have a significant correlation with the LEMS (p-value >0.05).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.