Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35241791›Full record

ReviewPediatric research2024

The newborn delivery room of tomorrow: emerging and future technologies.

Natalie Batey, Caroline Henry, Shalabh Garg, Michael Wagner, Atul Malhotra, Michel Valstar, Thomas Smith, Don Sharkey, European Society for Paediatric Research (ESPR) Neonatal Resuscitation Section Writing Group

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. HSPBiomedicines · 2025
    Article
  13. 21Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 18 institutions in 9 countries.

Natalie BateyNottingham Neonatal Service, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Caroline HenryNottingham Neonatal Service, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Shalabh GargDepartment of Neonatal Medicine, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
Michael WagnerDivision of Neonatology, Pediatric Intensive Care and Neuropediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Comprehensive Center for Pediatrics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Atul MalhotraMonash Newborn, Monash Children's Hospital and Department of Paediatrics, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Michel ValstarSchool of Computer Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Thomas SmithSchool of Computer Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Don SharkeyNottingham Neonatal Service, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK. Don.sharkey@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4989-8697
European Society for Paediatric Research (ESPR) Neonatal Resuscitation Section Writing Group
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBLeiden University · NLLandeskrankenhaus Feldkirch · ATChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USJames Cook University Hospital · GBOslo University Hospital · NORoyal Women's Hospital · AUUniversity of Botswana · BWDurham University · GBLeiden University Medical Center · NLMedical University of Vienna · ATMonash Children’s Hospital · AUMonash University · AURadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DEUniversity of Oxford · GBVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

Medical Research CouncilNational Health and Medical Research CouncilNational Institute of Health Research (NIHR)NIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in neonatal care have resulted in improved outcomes for high-risk newborns with technologies playing a significant part although many were developed for the neonatal intensive care unit. The care provided in the delivery room (DR) during the first few minutes of life can impact short- and long-term neonatal outcomes. Increasingly, technologies have a critical role to play in the DR particularly with monitoring and information provision. However, the DR is a unique environment and has major challenges around the period of foetal to neonatal transition that need to be overcome when developing new technologies. This review focuses on current DR technologies as well as those just emerging and further over the horizon. We identify what key opinion leaders in DR care think of current technologies, what the important DR measures are to them, and which technologies might be useful in the future. We link these with key technologies including respiratory function monitors, electoral impedance tomography, videolaryngoscopy, augmented reality, video recording, eye tracking, artificial intelligence, and contactless monitoring. Encouraging funders and industry to address the unique technological challenges of newborn care in the DR will allow the continued improvement of outcomes of high-risk infants from the moment of birth. IMPACT: Technological advances for newborn delivery room care require consideration of the unique environment, the variable patient characteristics, and disease states, as well as human factor challenges. Neonatology as a speciality has embraced technology, allowing its rapid progression and improved outcomes for infants, although innovation in the delivery room often lags behind that in the intensive care unit. Investing in new and emerging technologies can support healthcare providers when optimising care and could improve training, safety, and neonatal outcomes.

Indexed as

Delivery RoomsFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, Neonatal

Identifiers

PMID35241791
PMCPMC11499259
OpenAlexW4214822318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.