Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35241788›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2022

Siderophores as an iron source for picocyanobacteria in deep chlorophyll maximum layers of the oligotrophic ocean.

Shane L Hogle, Thomas Hackl, Randelle M Bundy, Jiwoon Park, Brandon Satinsky, Teppo Hiltunen, Steven Biller, Paul M Berube, Sallie W Chisholm

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Chitin utilization by marine picocyanobacteria and the evolution of a planktonic lifestyle.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Shane L HogleDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA. shane.hogle@utu.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2595-3863
Thomas HacklDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0022-320X
Randelle M BundySchool of Oceanography, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0600-3953
Jiwoon ParkSchool of Oceanography, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Brandon SatinskyDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Teppo HiltunenDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7206-2399
Steven BillerDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2638-823X
Paul M BerubeDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5598-6602
Sallie W ChisholmDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA. chisholm@mit.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1480-2445
Massachusetts Institute of Technology · USUniversity of Turku · FIUniversity of Washington · USUniversity of Groningen · NLWellesley College · US

Funding

NSF | BIO | Division of Biological Infrastructure (DBI) DBI-0424599NSF | GEO | Division of Ocean Sciences (OCE) OCE-1153588Simons Foundation 329108Simons Foundation 647135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus are the most abundant photosynthesizing organisms in the oceans. Gene content variation among picocyanobacterial populations in separate ocean basins often mirrors the selective pressures imposed by the region's distinct biogeochemistry. By pairing genomic datasets with trace metal concentrations from across the global ocean, we show that the genomic capacity for siderophore-mediated iron uptake is widespread in Synechococcus and low-light adapted Prochlorococcus populations from deep chlorophyll maximum layers of iron-depleted regions of the oligotrophic Pacific and S. Atlantic oceans: Prochlorococcus siderophore consumers were absent in the N. Atlantic ocean (higher new iron flux) but constituted up to half of all Prochlorococcus genomes from metagenomes in the N. Pacific (lower new iron flux). Picocyanobacterial siderophore consumers, like many other bacteria with this trait, also lack siderophore biosynthesis genes indicating that they scavenge exogenous siderophores from seawater. Statistical modeling suggests that the capacity for siderophore uptake is endemic to remote ocean regions where atmospheric iron fluxes are the smallest, especially at deep chlorophyll maximum and primary nitrite maximum layers. We argue that abundant siderophore consumers at these two common oceanographic features could be a symptom of wider community iron stress, consistent with prior hypotheses. Our results provide a clear example of iron as a selective force driving the evolution of marine picocyanobacteria.

Indexed as

ProchlorococcusSynechococcusChlorophyllIronMetagenomeOceans and SeasPacific OceanPhylogenySeawaterSiderophoresChlorophyllIronSiderophores

Identifiers

PMID35241788
PMCPMC9122953
OpenAlexW4220970849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.