Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35241715›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2022

A systematic review and meta-analysis of social cognition training success across the healthy lifespan.

Mandy Roheger, Kseniya Hranovska, Andrew K Martin, Marcus Meinzer

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Disentangling the role of executive function and episodic memory in older adults' performance on dynamic theory of mind tasks.Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition · 2025
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. Resilience Through Social Connectedness and Cognition: Is Theory of Mind a Form of Enrichment for Older adults?The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mandy RohegerDepartment of Neurology, University Medicine Greifswald, Walther Rathenau Str. 49, 17489, Greifswald, Germany. mandy.roheger@med.uni-greifswald.de.
Kseniya HranovskaDepartment of Neurology, University Medicine Greifswald, Walther Rathenau Str. 49, 17489, Greifswald, Germany.
Andrew K MartinDepartment of Psychology, University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7NP, UK.
Marcus MeinzerDepartment of Neurology, University Medicine Greifswald, Walther Rathenau Str. 49, 17489, Greifswald, Germany.
Universitätsmedizin Greifswald · DEUniversity of Kent · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Socio-cognitive abilities and challenges change across the healthy lifespan and are essential for successful human interaction. Identifying effective socio-cognitive training approaches for healthy individuals may prevent development of mental or physical disease and reduced quality of life. A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE Ovid, Web of Science Core Collection, CENTRAL, and PsycInfo databases. Studies that investigated different socio-cognitive trainings for healthy individuals across the human lifespan assessing effects on theory of mind, emotion recognition, perspective taking, and social decision making were included. A random-effects pairwise meta-analysis was conducted. Risk-of-Bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias-2-Tool. Twenty-three intervention studies with N = 1835 participants were included in the systematic review; twelve randomized controlled trials in the meta-analysis (N = 875). Socio-cognitive trainings differed regarding duration and content in different age groups, with theory of mind being the domain most frequently trained. Results of the meta-analysis showed that trainings were highly effective for improving theory of mind in children aged 3-5 years (SMD = 2.51 (95%CI: 0.48-4.53)), children aged 7-9 years (SMD = 2.71 (95%CI: - 0.28 to 5.71)), and older adults (SMD = 5.90 (95%CI: 2.77-9.02). Theory of mind training was highly effective in all investigated age-groups for improving theory of mind, yet, more research on transfer effects to other socio-cognitive processes and further investigation of training effects in other socio-cognitive domains (e.g., emotion recognition, visual perspective taking, social decision making) is needed. Identified characteristics of successful socio-cognitive trainings in different age groups may help designing future training studies for other populations.Registration: www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ (ID: CRD42020193297).

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyQuality of LifeAgedChildHealth StatusHumansLongevityRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSocial Cognition

Identifiers

PMID35241715
PMCPMC8894472
OpenAlexW4214934834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.