SynthesisScientific reports2022
A systematic review and meta-analysis of social cognition training success across the healthy lifespan.
Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- SEE+ computerized classroom-based training enhances 7- to 10-year-olds' socio-emotional cognition through observation and inference.PloS one · 2025Trial
- Predicting Social Cognitive Outcomes in Adolescent-Onset Schizophrenia: A Hierarchical Analysis of Pharmacogenetic, Clinical, and Environmental Factors.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- A case-control study examining the relationship between social cognition and post-traumatic stress disorder.BJPsych open · 2026Article
- 'Early Life Adversity and Social Cognition in the General Adult Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis'.Journal of child & adolescent trauma · 2025Article
- Disentangling the role of executive function and episodic memory in older adults' performance on dynamic theory of mind tasks.Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition · 2025Article
- Mindsets over matter: priming theory of mind improves older adults' mental state attributions about naturalistic social interactions.Aging & mental health · 2025Observational
- Resilience Through Social Connectedness and Cognition: Is Theory of Mind a Form of Enrichment for Older adults?The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2025Article
- Impact of individual differences in cognitive reserve, stress, and busyness on episodic memory: an fMRI analysis of the Alabama Brain Study On Risk for Dementia.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2025Article
- The promotion of mature theory of mind skills in educational settings: a mini-review.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Review
- Individual characteristics of physical and mental development and their connection with regular physical exercises when playing basketball.Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Busyness, mental engagement, and stress: Relationships to neurocognitive aging and behavior.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Socio-cognitive abilities and challenges change across the healthy lifespan and are essential for successful human interaction. Identifying effective socio-cognitive training approaches for healthy individuals may prevent development of mental or physical disease and reduced quality of life. A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE Ovid, Web of Science Core Collection, CENTRAL, and PsycInfo databases. Studies that investigated different socio-cognitive trainings for healthy individuals across the human lifespan assessing effects on theory of mind, emotion recognition, perspective taking, and social decision making were included. A random-effects pairwise meta-analysis was conducted. Risk-of-Bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias-2-Tool. Twenty-three intervention studies with N = 1835 participants were included in the systematic review; twelve randomized controlled trials in the meta-analysis (N = 875). Socio-cognitive trainings differed regarding duration and content in different age groups, with theory of mind being the domain most frequently trained. Results of the meta-analysis showed that trainings were highly effective for improving theory of mind in children aged 3-5 years (SMD = 2.51 (95%CI: 0.48-4.53)), children aged 7-9 years (SMD = 2.71 (95%CI: - 0.28 to 5.71)), and older adults (SMD = 5.90 (95%CI: 2.77-9.02). Theory of mind training was highly effective in all investigated age-groups for improving theory of mind, yet, more research on transfer effects to other socio-cognitive processes and further investigation of training effects in other socio-cognitive domains (e.g., emotion recognition, visual perspective taking, social decision making) is needed. Identified characteristics of successful socio-cognitive trainings in different age groups may help designing future training studies for other populations.Registration: www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ (ID: CRD42020193297).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.