Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35241436›Full record

ReviewBMJ open quality2022

Inpatient pharmacists using a readmission risk model in supporting discharge medication reconciliation to reduce unplanned hospital readmissions: a quality improvement intervention.

David Gallagher, Maegan Greenland, Desirae Lindquist, Lisa Sadolf, Casey Scully, Kristian Knutsen, Congwen Zhao, Benjamin A Goldstein, Lindsey Burgess

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ open quality, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Pharmacys Impact on Hospitals and Health Systems.North Carolina medical journal · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The impact of a multidisciplinary goals-of-care program on unplanned readmission rates at a comprehensive cancer center.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

David GallagherMedicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA david.gallagher@duke.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9104-744X
Maegan GreenlandPharmacy, Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Desirae LindquistPharmacy, Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Lisa SadolfPharmacy, Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Casey ScullyPerformance Services, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Kristian KnutsenPerformance Services, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Congwen ZhaoDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Benjamin A GoldsteinDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Lindsey BurgessPharmacy, Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Duke University Hospital · USDuke University · USDuke University Health System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionReducing unplanned hospital readmissions is an important priority for all hospitals and health systems. Hospital discharge can be complicated by discrepancies in the medication reconciliation and/or prescribing processes. Clinical pharmacist involvement in the medication reconciliation process at discharge can help prevent these discrepancies and possibly reduce unplanned hospital readmissions.

methodsWe report the results of our quality improvement intervention at Duke University Hospital, in which pharmacists were involved in the discharge medication reconciliation process on select high-risk general medicine patients over 2 years (2018-2020). Pharmacists performed traditional discharge medication reconciliation which included a review of medications for clinical appropriateness and affordability. A total of 1569 patients were identified as high risk for hospital readmission using the Epic readmission risk model and had a clinical pharmacist review the discharge medication reconciliation.

resultsThis intervention was associated with a significantly lower 7-day readmission rate in patients who scored high risk for readmission and received pharmacist support in discharge medication reconciliation versus those patients who did not receive pharmacist support (5.8% vs 7.6%). There was no effect on readmission rates of 14 or 30 days. The clinical pharmacists had at least one intervention on 67% of patients reviewed and averaged 1.75 interventions per patient.

conclusionThis quality improvement study showed that having clinical pharmacists intervene in the discharge medication reconciliation process in patients identified as high risk for readmission is associated with lower unplanned readmission rates at 7 days. The interventions by pharmacists were significant and well received by ordering providers. This study highlights the important role of a clinical pharmacist in the discharge medication reconciliation process.

Indexed as

Medication ReconciliationPharmacistsHumansInpatientsPatient DischargePatient ReadmissionQuality Improvementhospital medicinemedication reconciliationpharmaciststransitions in care

Identifiers

PMID35241436
PMCPMC8896047
OpenAlexW4214920154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.