Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35241184›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2022

Development and feasibility testing of a training programme for community pharmacists to deliver a culturally responsive medication review intervention.

Amanda J Wheeler, Jie Hu, Santosh Kumar Tadakamadla, Kerry Hall, Adrian Miller, Fiona Kelly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amanda J WheelerMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Nathan campus, Brisbane, 4111, Australia. a.wheeler@griffith.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9755-674X
Jie HuMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Nathan campus, Brisbane, 4111, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2940-6525
Santosh Kumar TadakamadlaMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Nathan campus, Brisbane, 4111, Australia.
Kerry HallMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Nathan campus, Brisbane, 4111, Australia.
Adrian MillerCQ University, Townsville, Qld, Australia.
Fiona KellySchool of Pharmacy & Medical Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7360-4655

Funding

Department of Health, Australian Government NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCultural differences between health professionals and Indigenous peoples contribute to health inequalities, and effective cross-cultural communication and person-centred healthcare are critical remedial elements. Community pharmacists can play a significant role by reducing medication-related problems through medication reviews, yet barriers to access include cultural and linguistic challenges. The Indigenous Medication Review Service (IMeRSe) aimed to address these barriers via a culturally responsive intervention. The aim of this paper is to present the cross-cultural training framework developed as a component of this intervention and the feasibility evaluation of the first stage of the training framework.

methodsA training framework was developed, emphasising pharmacists' skills and confidence in effective cross-cultural communication and relationship-building with Indigenous Australians (Please note that the use of the term 'Indigenous' in this manuscript includes all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and acknowledges their rich traditions and heterogenous cultures) across three stages: (1) online and workshop-based, covering Indigenous history and health, cross-cultural communication and a holistic, strengths-based approach to intervention delivery; (2) orientation to local Aboriginal Health Services, community and cultural protocols; and (3) ongoing mentoring. The feasibility evaluation of the first stage included the following: self-reported levels of cultural capability, cultural confidence and skills, motivators and barriers to working with Indigenous Australians, assessed pre- and post-training. Participants completed self-administered questionnaires including a 22-item validated Cultural Capability Measurement Tool. Paired t tests assessed change in mean scores of Likert scale data.

resultsStage 1 development resulted in an 8.5-h standardised cross-cultural training programme tested with 39 pharmacists working across urban and rural/remote Australia. Thirty-six pharmacists completed the feasibility evaluation (75.7% female, all non-Indigenous, 75.7% never attended prior cross-cultural training). Participants reported overall acceptability with training; the majority perceived it added value to their practice. Improved cultural capability post-training was reflected in increased scores for 21/22 items, nine reaching statistical significance. There were significant improvements for all 26 confidence and skills statements, and selected motivational and barrier statements, particularly participants role in improving Indigenous health outcomes and cross-cultural communication.

conclusionsThis study provides preliminary evidence that the training programme was feasible to deliver and prepared pharmacists to deliver a culturally responsive medication review intervention. The online knowledge-based modules and face-to-face workshops provide a standardised framework for larger-scale implementation of the intervention training.

trial registrationAustralia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12618000188235 .Prospectively registered 22 January 2018.

Indexed as

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peopleCommunity pharmacistsCultural trainingFeasibility studyIndigenous healthMedicationPilot study

Identifiers

PMID35241184
PMCPMC8892753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.