Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35241176›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2022

Functional standing frame programme early after severe sub-acute stroke (SPIRES): a randomised controlled feasibility trial.

Angela Logan, Jennifer Freeman, Bridie Kent, Jill Pooler, Siobhan Creanor, Doyo Enki, Jane Vickery, Andrew Barton, Jonathan Marsden

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Angela LoganFaculty of Health, School of Health Professions, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK. angie.logan@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8776-1114
Jennifer FreemanFaculty of Health, School of Health Professions, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Bridie KentFaculty of Health, School of Health Professions, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Jill PoolerFaculty of Health, School of Health Professions, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Siobhan CreanorPeninsula Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Doyo EnkiFaculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Jane VickeryPeninsula Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Andrew BartonNIHR Research Design Service, Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth, UK.
Jonathan MarsdenFaculty of Health, School of Health Professions, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
University of Plymouth · GBPeninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry · GBRoyal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Exeter · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

National Institute for Health Research ICA-CDRF- 2015-01-044
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly mobilisation (> 24 h post-stroke) is recommended for people with stroke. However, there is a paucity of evidence about how to implement early mobilisation for people who have had a severe stroke. Prolonged standing and task-specific training (sit-to-stand repetitions) have separately been evaluated in the literature; however, these functionally linked tasks have not been evaluated in combination for people with severe sub-acute stroke.

methodsThe objective was to determine the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of a functional standing frame programme compared with usual physiotherapy for people with severe sub-acute stroke. An assessor-blinded feasibility RCT with nested qualitative component (interviews and focus group) and process evaluation was adopted. Participants were aged ≥ 18 years with new diagnosis of severe sub-acute stroke (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 4/5) from four Stroke Rehabilitation Units across South West England. Participants were randomised to receive either: (1) functional standing frame programme (30 min. standing plus sit-to-stand repetitions) plus 15 min of usual physiotherapy daily (intervention); (2) usual physiotherapy (45 min) daily (control). Both programmes were protocolised to be undertaken a minimum of five sessions per week for 3 weeks. Feasibility indicators included process, resource, management, and safety. Adherence, fidelity, and acceptability of the trial and intervention were evaluated using data recorded by therapists, observation of intervention and control sessions, interviews and one focus group. Patient measures of motor impairment, activities/participation, and quality of life were carried out by blinded assessors at baseline, 3, 15, 29, and 55 weeks post-randomisation.

resultsForty-five participants (51-96 years; 42% male, mRS 4 = 80% 5 = 20%) were randomised (n = 22 to intervention). Twenty-seven (60%) participants were followed-up at all time points. Twelve participants (27%) died during the trial; no deaths were related to the trial. Adherence to the minimum number of sessions was low: none of the participants completed all 21 sessions, and only 8 participants (18%) across both groups completed ≥ 15 sessions, over the 3 weeks; 39% intervention; 51% control sessions were completed; mean session duration 39 min (SD 19) control, 37 min intervention (SD 11). Intervention group: mean standing time 13 min (SD 9); mean sit-to-stand repetitions/session 5 (SD 4). Interviews were conducted with 10 participants, four relatives and six physiotherapists. Five physiotherapists attended a focus group.

conclusionsThe majority of progression criteria for this feasibility trial were met. However, adherence to the interventions was unacceptably low. This aspect of the trial design needs to be addressed prior to moving to a definitive RCT of this standing frame intervention in people with severe sub-acute stroke. Solutions have been identified to address these concerns.

trial registrationInternational Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number ISRCTN15412695 . Registration 19 December 2016.

Indexed as

Feasibility randomised controlled trialPhysiotherapySevere strokeStroke rehabilitationSub-acute strokeSupported standingTask-specific training

Identifiers

PMID35241176
PMCPMC8892736
OpenAlexW4214938754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.