Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35241172›Full record

ReviewArthroplasty (London, England)2022

Surgical site infection after wound closure with staples versus sutures in elective knee and hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

A van de Kuit, R J Krishnan, W H Mallee, L M Goedhart, B Lambert, J N Doornberg, T M J S Vervest, J Martin

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Arthroplasty (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Frequency and Risk Factors of Surgical Site Infection among Sudanese Patients with Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

A van de KuitUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2571-458X
R J KrishnanDepartment of Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine and Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, MEDICI Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
W H MalleeDepartment of Orthopaedics, Joint Research, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
L M GoedhartDepartment of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Groningen, Postbus 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
B LambertDepartment of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Groningen, Postbus 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
J N DoornbergDepartment of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Groningen, Postbus 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands. j.n.doorberg@umcg.nl.
T M J S VervestDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tergooi Hospital, Hilversum, The Netherlands.
J MartinDepartment of Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine and Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, MEDICI Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
University Medical Center Groningen · NLWestern University · CAOLVG · NLTergooi · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to study surgical site infection of wound closure using staples versus sutures in elective knee and hip arthroplasties.

methodsA systematic literature review was performed to search for randomized controlled trials that compared surgical site infection after wound closure using staples versus sutures in elective knee and hip arthroplasties. The primary outcome was surgical site infection. The risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. The relative risk and 95% confidence interval with a random-effects model were assessed.

resultsEight studies were included in this study, including 2 studies with a low risk of bias, 4 studies having 'some concerns', and 2 studies with high risk of bias. Significant difference was not found in the risk of SSI for patients with staples (n = 557) versus sutures (n = 573) (RR: 1.70, 95% CI: 0.94-3.08, I

conclusionsStapling might carry a higher risk of surgical site infection than suturing in elective knee and hip arthroplasties, especially in hip arthroplasty.

Indexed as

ArthroplastySurgical site infectionSystematic reviewTotal hip replacementTotal knee replacementWound closure

Identifiers

PMID35241172
PMCPMC8896293
OpenAlexW4214929187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.