ArticleBMC health services research2022
The role of feedback in emergency ambulance services: a qualitative interview study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Types and effects of feedback for emergency ambulance staff: a systematic mixed studies review and meta-analysis.BMJ quality & safety · 2023Pooled it
- Positivity in the paramedic workplace: pathways to flourishing amidst adversity.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- It's time to talk to emergency medical dispatchers: survey study on performance feedback and patient outcome follow-up to EMDs.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Missed opportunities of feedback for emergency ambulance staff: a mixed-methods diary study.British paramedic journal · 2025Article
- The urgent need for patients' diagnoses and outcome feedback in Germany's emergency medical services - insights from a web-based survey.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Providing feedback to frontline paramedics involved in research: a service evaluation within Yorkshire Ambulance Service.British paramedic journal · 2025Article
- Article
- Variation in ambulance pre-alert process and practice: cross-sectional survey of ambulance clinicians.Emergency medicine journal : EMJ · 2024Article
- Development and psychometric evaluation of an instrument measuring ambulance nurses' adherence and attitudes to acute chest pain guidelines.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- A national perspective of ambulance clinicians' perceptions, experiences and decision-making processes when assessing older adults with a head injury: a mixed-methods study.British paramedic journal · 2024Article
- Prevalence, predictors and outcomes of self-reported feedback for EMS professionals: a mixed-methods diary study.BMC emergency medicine · 2024Observational
- Prehospital emergency nurses' experiences of caring for patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction: an interview study.BMJ open · 2024Article
- What influences ambulance clinician decisions to pre-alert emergency departments: a qualitative exploration of pre-alert practice in UK ambulance services and emergency departments.Emergency medicine journal : EMJ · 2024Article
- Article
- "Discovering shine through feedback seeking"---feedback seeking among new graduate nurses: a qualitative study.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- An Integrative Systematic Review of Promoting Patient Safety Within Prehospital Emergency Medical Services by Paramedics: A Role Theory Perspective.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024Review
- The awareness of public about the Emergency Medical Services in the Eastern region of Saudi Arabia.PloS one · 2024Article
- Commentary on gaps in prehospital trauma care: education and bioengineering innovations to improve outcomes in hemorrhage and traumatic brain injury.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2024Review
- Feedback for Emergency Ambulance Staff: A National Review of Current Practice Informed by Realist Evaluation Methodology.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Conflict in the EMS Workforce: An Analysis of an Open-Ended Survey Question Reveals a Complex Assemblage of Stress, Burnout, and Pandemic-Related Factors Influencing Well-Being.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSeveral international studies suggest that the feedback that emergency ambulance service (EMS) personnel receive on the care they have delivered lacks structure, relevance, credibility and routine implementation. Feedback in this context can relate to performance or patient outcomes, can come from a variety of sources and can be sought or imposed. Evidence from health services research and implementation science, suggests that feedback can change professional behavior, improve clinical outcomes and positively influence staff mental health. The current study aimed to explore the experience of EMS professionals regarding current feedback provision and their views on how feedback impacts on patient care, patient safety and staff wellbeing.
methodsThis qualitative study was conducted as part of a wider study of work-related wellbeing in EMS professionals. We used purposive sampling to select 24 frontline EMS professionals from one ambulance service in the United Kingdom and conducted semi-structured interviews. The data was analyzed in iterative cycles of inductive and deductive reasoning using Abductive Thematic Network Analysis. The analysis was informed by psychological theory, as well as models from the wider feedback effectiveness and feedback-seeking behavior literature.
resultsParticipants viewed current feedback provision as inadequate and consistently expressed a desire for increased feedback. Reported types of prehospital feedback included patient outcome feedback, patient-experience feedback, peer-to-peer feedback, performance feedback, feedforward: on-scene advice, debriefing and investigations and coroners' reports. Participants raised concerns that inadequate feedback could negatively impact on patient safety by preventing learning from mistakes. Enhancing feedback provision was thought to improve patient care and staff wellbeing by supporting personal and professional development.
conclusionsIn line with previous research in this area, this study highlights EMS professionals' strong desire for feedback. The study advances the literature by suggesting a typology of prehospital feedback and presenting a unique insight into the motives for feedback-seeking using psychological theory. A logic model for prehospital feedback interventions was developed to inform future research and development into prehospital feedback.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.