Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35240053›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Oncology2022

Elective upper-neck versus whole-neck irradiation of the uninvolved neck in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an open-label, non-inferiority, multicentre, randomised phase 3 trial.

Ling-Long Tang, Cheng-Long Huang, Ning Zhang, Wei Jiang, Yi-Shan Wu, Shao Hui Huang, Yan-Ping Mao, Qing Liu, Ji-Bin Li, Shao-Qiang Liang and 7 more

4 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 40 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
18.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02642107 phase3completednot on this map

The Multicenter Randomized Phase 3 Trial of Individualized Elective Neck Irradiation Based on MRI in Patients With Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorSun Yat-sen UniversityRan2016 to 2018Enrolled446ConditionsNasopharyngeal CarcinomaArmsElective neck irradiation, Whole neck irradiation
NCT06239727 phase3recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Reduced-dose Radiotherapy for Stage III Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Based on the Treatment Response: an Open Label, Non-Inferiority, Multicenter, Randomized Phase 3 Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSun Yat-sen UniversityRan2024 to 2030Enrolled593ConditionsNasopharyngeal CarcinomaArmsPD-1 blocking antibody, Gemcitabine, Cisplatin (80 mg/m2), Reduced-dose Intensity-modulated radiotherapy, Conventional-dose Intensity-modulated radiotherapy
NCT07110558 phase2not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Single-arm, Phase II Trial of Radiotherapy Without Prophylactic Neck Irradiation in Combination With Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Anti-PD-1 Antibody Toripalimab for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorSun Yat-sen UniversityRan2025 to 2032Enrolled59ConditionsNasopharyngeal Cancinoma (NPC)ArmsWithout prophylactic neck irradiation, PD-1 antibody (Toripalimab), Cisplatin
NCT07201337 phase3active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized, Open-Label, Non-Inferiority Phase III Multicenter Clinical Trial Comparing Reduced-Dose to Standard-Dose Prophylactic Irradiation for Low-Risk Clinical Target Volume (CTV) in the Treatment of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

TypeinterventionalSponsorSun Yat-sen UniversityRan2025 to 2031Enrolled700ConditionsNasopharyngeal Cancinoma (NPC)ArmsRadiation Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Diagnostic and Economic Evaluation of [Journal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Ling-Long TangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.
Cheng-Long HuangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.
Ning ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, China.
Wei JiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guilin, China.
Yi-Shan WuDepartment of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.
Shao Hui HuangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Yan-Ping MaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.
Qing LiuClinical Trials Centre, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.
Ji-Bin LiClinical Trials Centre, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.
Shao-Qiang LiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, China.
Guan-Jie QinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guilin, China.
Wei-Han HuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.
Ying SunDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.
Fang-Yun XieDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.
Lei ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.
Guan-Qun ZhouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.
Jun MaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China. Electronic address: majun2@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNFirst People's Hospital of Foshan · CNGuilin Medical University · CNPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this trial was to address whether elective ipsilateral upper-neck irradiation (UNI) sparing the uninvolved lower neck provides similar regional relapse-free survival compared with standard whole-neck irradiation (WNI) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

methodsThis open-label, non-inferiority, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial was done at three Chinese medical centres. Patients aged 18-65 years with untreated, non-keratinising, non-distant metastatic (M0) nasopharyngeal carcinoma; with N0-N1 disease (according to International Union Against Cancer-American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM classification, seventh edition); and a Karnofsky performance status score of 70 or higher were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive elective UNI or WNI of the uninvolved neck. Total radiation doses of 70 Gy (for the primary tumour volume and the enlarged retropharyngeal nodes), 66-70 Gy (for the involved cervical lymph nodes), 60-62 Gy (for the high-risk target volume), and 54-56 Gy (for the low-risk target volume) were administered in 30-33 fractions, five fractions per week. Patients with stage II-IVA disease were recommended to receive combined intravenous cisplatin-based chemotherapy (either induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone). Randomisation was done centrally by the Clinical Trials Centre of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre by means of a computer-generated random number code with a block size of four. Patients were stratified according to treatment centre and nodal status. Investigators and patients were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was regional relapse-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. Non-inferiority was indicated if the upper limit of the 95% CI of the difference in 3-year regional relapse-free survival between the UNI and WNI groups was within 8%. Adverse events were analysed in the safety population (defined as all patients who commenced the randomly assigned treatment). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02642107, and is closed.

findingsBetween Jan 22, 2016, and May 23, 2018, 446 patients from 469 screened were randomly assigned to receive UNI (n=224) or WNI (n=222). Median follow-up was 53 months (IQR 46-59). 3-year regional relapse-free survival was similar in the UNI and WNI groups (97·7% [95% CI 95·7-99·7] in the UNI group vs 96·3% [93·8-98·8] in the WNI group; difference -1·4% [95% CI -4·6 to 1·8]; p

interpretationElective UNI of the uninvolved neck provides similar regional control and results in less radiation toxicity compared with standard WNI in patients with N0-N1 nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

fundingSun Yat-sen University Clinical Research 5010 Program, the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, and the Overseas Expertise Introduction Project for Discipline Innovation. TRANSLATION: For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Indexed as

Nasopharyngeal NeoplasmsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalAdolescentAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemoradiotherapyCisplatinHumansMiddle AgedNasopharyngeal CarcinomaNeoplasm StagingYoung AdultCisplatin

Identifiers

PMID35240053
OpenAlexW4214517876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.