ArticlePLoS computational biology2022
Encoding time in neural dynamic regimes with distinct computational tradeoffs.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Manifold properties in the macaque medial premotor cortex during switching from attending to tapping to a metronome.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- A neuronal correlate for time interval estimation in the crow's telencephalon.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Dynamical mechanisms of how an RNN keeps a beat, uncovered with a low-dimensional reduced model.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Ramping cells in the rodent medial prefrontal cortex encode time to past and future events via real Laplace transform.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Effect in the spectra of eigenvalues and dynamics of RNNs trained with excitatory-inhibitory constraint.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024Article
- Unified control of temporal and spatial scales of sensorimotor behavior through neuromodulation of short-term synaptic plasticity.Science advances · 2024Article
- Ramping cells in rodent mPFC encode time to past and future events via real Laplace transform.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Diverse Time Encoding Strategies Within the Medial Premotor Areas of the Primate.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024Review
- A Second Introduction to the Neurobiology of Interval Timing.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024Review
- Neural Sequences and the Encoding of Time.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024Review
- Article
- Multiplexing working memory and time in the trajectories of neural networks.Nature human behaviour · 2023Article
- Context-specific and context-invariant computations of interval timing.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Temporal encoding: Relative and absolute representations of time guide behavior.Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition · 2023Article
- Judgment of duration and passage of time in prospective and retrospective conditions and its predictors for short and long durations.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Neural population clocks: Encoding time in dynamic patterns of neural activity.Behavioral neuroscience · 2022Article
- Temporal scaling and computing time in neural circuits: Should we stop watching the clock and look for its gears?Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Converging evidence suggests the brain encodes time in dynamic patterns of neural activity, including neural sequences, ramping activity, and complex dynamics. Most temporal tasks, however, require more than just encoding time, and can have distinct computational requirements including the need to exhibit temporal scaling, generalize to novel contexts, or robustness to noise. It is not known how neural circuits can encode time and satisfy distinct computational requirements, nor is it known whether similar patterns of neural activity at the population level can exhibit dramatically different computational or generalization properties. To begin to answer these questions, we trained RNNs on two timing tasks based on behavioral studies. The tasks had different input structures but required producing identically timed output patterns. Using a novel framework we quantified whether RNNs encoded two intervals using either of three different timing strategies: scaling, absolute, or stimulus-specific dynamics. We found that similar neural dynamic patterns at the level of single intervals, could exhibit fundamentally different properties, including, generalization, the connectivity structure of the trained networks, and the contribution of excitatory and inhibitory neurons. Critically, depending on the task structure RNNs were better suited for generalization or robustness to noise. Further analysis revealed different connection patterns underlying the different regimes. Our results predict that apparently similar neural dynamic patterns at the population level (e.g., neural sequences) can exhibit fundamentally different computational properties in regards to their ability to generalize to novel stimuli and their robustness to noise-and that these differences are associated with differences in network connectivity and distinct contributions of excitatory and inhibitory neurons. We also predict that the task structure used in different experimental studies accounts for some of the experimentally observed variability in how networks encode time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.