Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35239644›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2022

Encoding time in neural dynamic regimes with distinct computational tradeoffs.

Shanglin Zhou, Sotiris C Masmanidis, Dean V Buonomano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Ramping cells in the rodent medial prefrontal cortex encode time to past and future events via real Laplace transform.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. A Second Introduction to the Neurobiology of Interval Timing.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  10. Neural Sequences and the Encoding of Time.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Temporal encoding: Relative and absolute representations of time guide behavior.Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shanglin ZhouDepartment of Neurobiology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7901-615X
Sotiris C MasmanidisDepartment of Neurobiology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8699-3335
Dean V BuonomanoDepartment of Neurobiology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8528-9231

Funding

CRCNS: Multiple Clocks for the Encoding of Time in Corticostriatal CircuitsR01NS125877 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BUONOMANO, DEAN V, MASMANIDIS, SOTIRIS · 2021 to 2025
$1.9M
Multiplexing working memory and timing: Encoding retrospective and prospective information in transient neural trajectories.RF1NS116589 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BUONOMANO, DEAN V, GOLSHANI, PEYMAN · 2020 to 2020
$1.8M
Multiplexing working memory and timing: Encoding retrospective and prospective information in transient neural trajectories.R01NS116589 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BUONOMANO, DEAN V, GOLSHANI, PEYMAN · 2023 to 2024
$1.2M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS116589NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS125877NINDS NIH HHS RF1 NS116589
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Converging evidence suggests the brain encodes time in dynamic patterns of neural activity, including neural sequences, ramping activity, and complex dynamics. Most temporal tasks, however, require more than just encoding time, and can have distinct computational requirements including the need to exhibit temporal scaling, generalize to novel contexts, or robustness to noise. It is not known how neural circuits can encode time and satisfy distinct computational requirements, nor is it known whether similar patterns of neural activity at the population level can exhibit dramatically different computational or generalization properties. To begin to answer these questions, we trained RNNs on two timing tasks based on behavioral studies. The tasks had different input structures but required producing identically timed output patterns. Using a novel framework we quantified whether RNNs encoded two intervals using either of three different timing strategies: scaling, absolute, or stimulus-specific dynamics. We found that similar neural dynamic patterns at the level of single intervals, could exhibit fundamentally different properties, including, generalization, the connectivity structure of the trained networks, and the contribution of excitatory and inhibitory neurons. Critically, depending on the task structure RNNs were better suited for generalization or robustness to noise. Further analysis revealed different connection patterns underlying the different regimes. Our results predict that apparently similar neural dynamic patterns at the population level (e.g., neural sequences) can exhibit fundamentally different computational properties in regards to their ability to generalize to novel stimuli and their robustness to noise-and that these differences are associated with differences in network connectivity and distinct contributions of excitatory and inhibitory neurons. We also predict that the task structure used in different experimental studies accounts for some of the experimentally observed variability in how networks encode time.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalNeuronsBrain

Identifiers

PMID35239644
PMCPMC8893702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.