Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35239250›Full record

ReviewJournal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution2023

Theme and variation in the evolution of insect sex determination.

Mara Laslo, Josefine Just, David R Angelini

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. The regulatory role of mFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Theme and variation in the evolution of insect sex determination.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mara LasloDepartment of Cell Biology, Curriculum Fellows Program, Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4022-4327
Josefine JustDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, 26 Oxford St, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5342-518X
David R AngeliniDepartment of Biology, Colby College, 5734 Mayflower Hill Dr, Waterville, Maine, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2776-2158
Harvard University · USColby College · US

Funding

The Maine Biomedical Research Network (INBRE)P20GM103423 · NIGMS · MOUNT DESERT ISLAND BIOLOGICAL LAB · PI Dustin Lynn Updike · 2012 to 2026
$60.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103423
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of dimorphic adult sexes is a critical process for most animals, one that is subject to intense selection. Work in vertebrate and insect model species has revealed that sex determination mechanisms vary widely among animal groups. However, this variation is not uniform, with a limited number of conserved factors. Therefore, sex determination offers an excellent context to consider themes and variations in gene network evolution. Here we review the literature describing sex determination in diverse insects. We have screened public genomic sequence databases for orthologs and duplicates of 25 genes involved in insect sex determination, identifying patterns of presence and absence. These genes and a 3.5 reference set of 43 others were used to infer phylogenies and compared to accepted organismal relationships to examine patterns of congruence and divergence. The function of candidate genes for roles in sex determination (virilizer, female-lethal-2-d, transformer-2) and sex chromosome dosage compensation (male specific lethal-1, msl-2, msl-3) were tested using RNA interference in the milkweed bug, Oncopeltus fasciatus. None of these candidate genes exhibited conserved roles in these processes. Amidst this variation we wish to highlight the following themes for the evolution of sex determination: (1) Unique features within taxa influence network evolution. (2) Their position in the network influences a component's evolution. Our analyses also suggest an inverse association of protein sequence conservation with functional conservation.

Indexed as

HeteropteraInsectaAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsFemaleGenes, InsectInsect ProteinsMalePhylogenyRNA InterferenceSex Determination ProcessesInsect Proteinsdosage compensationdoublesexgene network evolutionsex determinationsomatic sex differentiationtransformer

Identifiers

PMID35239250
PMCPMC10078687
OpenAlexW4214907242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.