Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35239175›Full record

Trial reportJournal of nephrology2022

High-volume hemodiafiltration decreases the pre-dialysis concentrations of indoxyl sulfate and p-cresyl sulfate compared to hemodialysis: a post-hoc analysis from the HDFit randomized controlled trial.

Jordana D Lima, Murilo Guedes, Silvia D Rodrigues, Ana Clara S Flórido, Andrea N Moreno-Amaral, Ana Beatriz Barra, Maria Eugênia Canziani, Américo Cuvello-Neto, Carlos Eduardo Poli-de-Figueiredo, Roberto Pecoits-Filho and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of nephrology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02787161 (Impact of HemoDiaFIltration on Physical Activity and Self-reported Outcomes), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02787161 nacompletednot on this map

Impact of HemoDiaFIltration on Physical Activity and Self-reported Outcomes: a Randomized Controlled Trial (HD-FIT Trial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorPontifícia Universidade Católica do ParanáRan2016 to 2018Enrolled195ConditionsChronic Kidney DiseaseArmsHemodiafiltration, Hemodialysis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Role of Online Hemodiafiltration in Contemporary Kidney Care.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Haemodiafiltration versus high-flux haemodialysis-a Consensus Statement from the EuDial Working Group of the ERA.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Jordana D Lima *Department of Basic Pathology, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
Murilo Guedes *School of Medicine, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
Silvia D RodriguesDepartment of Basic Pathology, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
Ana Clara S FlóridoSchool of Medicine, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
Andrea N Moreno-AmaralSchool of Medicine, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
Ana Beatriz BarraFresenius Medical Care, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Maria Eugênia CanzianiUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Américo Cuvello-NetoHospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, São Paulo, Brazil.
Carlos Eduardo Poli-de-FigueiredoPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Roberto Pecoits-Filho *School of Medicine, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
Lia S Nakao *Department of Basic Pathology, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil. lia.nakao@ufpr.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9647-6350
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná · BRUniversidade Federal do Paraná · BRHospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz · BRPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul · BRUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough high-volume online hemodiafiltration has been associated with higher clearance and lower pre-dialysis concentration of middle molecular weight toxins compared to hemodialysis, its effect on protein-bound uremic toxins has shown inconclusive results. In this study, we investigated whether hemodiafiltration impacts pre-dialysis plasma levels of the toxins indoxyl sulfate, p-cresyl sulfate, and indole-3-acetic acid compared to high-flux hemodialysis.

methodsThis is a post-hoc analysis of the multicenter, randomized controlled trial HDFit (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02787161). Uremic toxins were determined by high performance liquid chromatography at baseline, 3, and 6 months. Mean differences in monthly changes of pre-dialysis uremic toxin concentrations between hemodiafiltration and high-flux hemodialysis were analyzed using linear mixed-effect models.

resultsOne hundred ninety-three patients (mean age 53 years old, 71% males) were analyzed. There were no differences between groups regarding clinical and biochemical characteristics at baseline or duration of dialysis session and blood flows throughout the follow-up. Mean differences in rates of change (μM/month, [confidence interval CI]) in high-flux hemodialysis vs. hemodiafiltration were 2.4 [0.3 to 4.56], 3.94 [- 1.54 to 9.41] and 0.06 [- 0.6 to 0.5] for indoxyl sulfate, p-cresyl sulfate and indole-3-acetic acid, respectively. In the exploratory analysis, these differences in high-flux hemodialysis vs. hemodiafiltration subgroup with convective volume > 27.5 L were 2.86 [0.43 to 5.28], 7.43 [0.7 to 14.16] and - 0.19 [- 0.88 to 0.50].

conclusionThese exploratory findings suggest that hemodiafiltration is more effective in reducing indoxyl sulfate as compared to standard high-flux hemodialysis, and also that this effect was extended to p-cresyl sulfate in patients achieving higher convective volumes.

Indexed as

HemodiafiltrationIndicanDialysisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRenal DialysisSulfatesIndicanSulfatesConvective volumeHemodiafiltrationPost-hoc analysisProtein-bound uremic toxins

Identifiers

PMID35239175
OpenAlexW4214919477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.