Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35239152›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2022

Melaleuca alternifolia formulations in the treatment of experimental pythiosis.

Júlia de Souza Silveira, Carolina Litchina Brasil, Caroline Quintana Braga, Ândrios da Silva Moreira, Helen Cabaldi Franz, Rosimeri Zamboni, Eliza Simone Sallis, Ana Paula Albano, Cristina Gomes Zambrano, Lara Colles Araujo and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Potential anti-Microbiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Júlia de Souza SilveiraPrograma de Pós Graduação em Microbiologia e Parasitologia, Laboratório de Micologia, Departamento de Microbiologia e Parasitologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Prédio 18, Sala 14. Campus Universitário Capão do Leão, s/n◦, Pelotas, RS, CEP: 96160-000, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4158-9822
Carolina Litchina BrasilPrograma de Pós Graduação em Microbiologia e Parasitologia, Laboratório de Micologia, Departamento de Microbiologia e Parasitologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Prédio 18, Sala 14. Campus Universitário Capão do Leão, s/n◦, Pelotas, RS, CEP: 96160-000, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2965-5014
Caroline Quintana BragaPrograma de Pós Graduação em Microbiologia e Parasitologia, Laboratório de Micologia, Departamento de Microbiologia e Parasitologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Prédio 18, Sala 14. Campus Universitário Capão do Leão, s/n◦, Pelotas, RS, CEP: 96160-000, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1481-9829
Ândrios da Silva MoreiraPrograma de Pós Graduação em Microbiologia e Parasitologia, Laboratório de Micologia, Departamento de Microbiologia e Parasitologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Prédio 18, Sala 14. Campus Universitário Capão do Leão, s/n◦, Pelotas, RS, CEP: 96160-000, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8282-9979
Helen Cabaldi FranzCentro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8000-3866
Rosimeri ZamboniFaculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0709-660X
Eliza Simone SallisFaculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3033-9876
Ana Paula AlbanoFaculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0968-4907
Cristina Gomes ZambranoPrograma de Pós Graduação em Microbiologia e Parasitologia, Laboratório de Micologia, Departamento de Microbiologia e Parasitologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Prédio 18, Sala 14. Campus Universitário Capão do Leão, s/n◦, Pelotas, RS, CEP: 96160-000, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4062-5681
Lara Colles AraujoCentro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3636-6763
Cristiane de Bona da SilvaCentro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5993-214X
Luciana PötterDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Centro de Ciências Rurais, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6288-4468
Sônia de Avila BottonDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Centro de Ciências Rurais, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8855-9217
Daniela Isabel Brayer PereiraPrograma de Pós Graduação em Microbiologia e Parasitologia, Laboratório de Micologia, Departamento de Microbiologia e Parasitologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Prédio 18, Sala 14. Campus Universitário Capão do Leão, s/n◦, Pelotas, RS, CEP: 96160-000, Brazil. danielabrayer@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4374-677X
Universidade Federal de Pelotas · BRUniversidade Federal de Santa Maria · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Essential oils (EO) are aromatic compounds from the plant secondary metabolism. Melaleuca alternifolia EO is well known for its medicinal properties and promising use as an antimicrobial agent. Pythiosis is a difficult-to-treat and emerging disease caused by the oomycete Pythium insidiosum. This study evaluated a nanoemulsion formulation of M. alternifolia (NEMA) in topical and intralesional application to treat experimental pythiosis. Dermal toxicity tests were performed on M. alternifolia EO in Wistar rats. Pythiosis was reproduced in rabbits (n = 9) that were divided into groups: group 1 (control), cutaneous lesions with daily topical application of a non-ionizable gel-based formulation and intralesional application of sterile distilled water every 48 h; group 2 (topical formulation), lesions treated daily with topical application of a non-ionizable gel-based formulation containing 5 mg/ml of NEMA; and group 3 (intralesional formulation), lesions treated with NEMA at 5 mg/ml in aqueous solution applied intralesionally/48 h. The animals were treated for 45 days, and the subcutaneous lesion areas were measured every 5 days. M. alternifolia EO showed no dermal toxicity. The lesion areas treated with intralesional NEMA reduced at the end of treatment, differing from groups 1 and 2 (P < 0.05). In the topically treated group, the lesion areas did not differ from the control group, although the number of hyphae significantly reduced (P < 0.05). Under the experimental conditions of this study, the NEMA formulations presented a favorable safety profile. However, further studies are required to evaluate if this safety applies to higher concentrations of NEMA and to validate its use in clinical pythiosis.

Indexed as

MelaleucaOils, VolatilePythiosisPythiumAnimalsRabbitsRatsRats, WistarOils, VolatileEssential oilsIntralesionNanoemulsionPythium insidiosumTopic

Identifiers

PMID35239152
PMCPMC9151964
OpenAlexW4214890503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.