Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35239130›Full record

ArticleRadiological physics and technology2022

Marker-less and calibration-less motion correction method for brain PET.

Yuma Iwao, Go Akamatsu, Hideaki Tashima, Miwako Takahashi, Taiga Yamaya

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Fast Reconstruction for Deep Learning PET Head Motion Correction.Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yuma IwaoInstitute for Quantum Medical Science, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan. iwao.yuma@qst.go.jp.
Go AkamatsuInstitute for Quantum Medical Science, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan.
Hideaki TashimaInstitute for Quantum Medical Science, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan.
Miwako TakahashiInstitute for Quantum Medical Science, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan.
Taiga YamayaInstitute for Quantum Medical Science, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan. yamaya.taiga@qst.go.jp.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 17K18376
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Marker-less head motion correction methods have been well-studied; however, no reports discussing potential issues in positional calibration between a PET system and an external sensor remain limited. In this study, we develop a method for positional calibration between the PET system and an external range sensor to achieve practical head motion correction. The basic concept of the developed method involves using the subject's face model as a marker not only for head motion detection but also for the system positional calibration. The face model of the subject, which can be obtained easily using the range sensor, can also be calculated from a computed tomography (CT) image of the same subject. The CT image, which is acquired separately for attenuation correction in PET, has the same coordinates as the PET image because of the appropriate matching algorithm between CT and PET images. The proposed method was implemented in the helmet-type PET and the motion correction accuracy was assessed quantitatively using a mannequin head. The phantom experiments demonstrated the performance of the developed motion correction method; high-resolution images with no trace of the applied motion were obtained as if no motion was provided. Statistical analysis supported the visual assessment results in terms of the spatial resolution, contrast recovery; uniformity, and the results implied that motion with correction slightly improved image quality compared with the motionless case. The tolerance of the developed method against potential tracking errors had a minimum 10% difference in the amplitude of the rotation angle.

Indexed as

ArtifactsBrainAlgorithmsCalibrationImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMotionPhantoms, ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyHelmet-PETMotion correctionPositron emission tomography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.