ArticleJournal of medical ultrasonics (2001)2022
Sonographic evaluation of the abductor pollicis brevis muscle reflects muscle strength recovery after carpal tunnel release.
Article in Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to examine the associations between sonographic measurements of the abductor pollicis brevis (APB), grip and pinch strength, and distal motor latency (DML) in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) before and after surgery.
methodsWe prospectively studied patients (46 hands) who underwent 1 year of postoperative follow-up after endoscopic carpal tunnel release. The patients underwent ultrasound (US) scans, grip and pinch strength assessment, a nerve conduction study, and patient-reported outcome measures (Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Instrument and Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire) before and 1 year after surgery. The standardized response mean was calculated to compare the sensitivity of clinical changes in these measurements.
resultsUS measurements (thickness of the APB and the cross-sectional area of the APB) and muscle strength (grip strength, key pinch, and tip pinch) were greater, and DML was reduced after surgery compared with those before surgery (all P < 0.05). Patient-reported outcome measures also showed clinical improvement 1 year after surgery (P < 0.05). US measurements of the APB were significantly correlated with grip and pinch strength (all P < 0.05), but not with DML, before surgery and 1 year after surgery. The standardized response mean showed a large responsiveness for US measurements of the APB and patient-reported outcome measures.
conclusionUS evaluation of the APB after CTS can complement the evaluation of grip and pinch strength in the clinical setting. Postoperative recovery of the APB leads to improved motor dysfunction in CTS. Therefore, US measurement of the APB could be a useful tool for evaluating motor function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.