Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35239053›Full record

SynthesisNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2022

Is transcranial magnetic stimulation as treatment for neuropathic pain in patients with spinal cord injury efficient? A systematic review.

Christian Saleh, Tatiani Soultana Ilia, Phillip Jaszczuk, Margret Hund-Georgiadis, Anna Walter

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06284694 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Treatment of Neuropathic Pain Following Spinal Cord Injury - a Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Approach

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CalgaryRan2024 to 2025Enrolled10ConditionsNeuropathic PainArmsRepetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)
NCT06726954 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Therapy in Neuropathic Pain Associated With Spinal Cord Injury; Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAfyonkarahisar Health Sciences UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled63ConditionsSpinal Cord Injuries, Neuropathic PainArmsHigh-frequency real-time rTMS DLPF cortex protocol, High-frequency real-time rTMS M1 motor cortex protocol, Sham rTMS Protocol
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christian SalehClinic for Neurorehabilitation and Paraplegiology, REHAB Basel, Im Burgfelderhof 40, CH-4055, Basel, Switzerland.
Tatiani Soultana IliaClinic for Neurorehabilitation and Paraplegiology, REHAB Basel, Im Burgfelderhof 40, CH-4055, Basel, Switzerland.
Phillip JaszczukClinic for Neurorehabilitation and Paraplegiology, REHAB Basel, Im Burgfelderhof 40, CH-4055, Basel, Switzerland.
Margret Hund-GeorgiadisClinic for Neurorehabilitation and Paraplegiology, REHAB Basel, Im Burgfelderhof 40, CH-4055, Basel, Switzerland.
Anna WalterClinic for Neurorehabilitation and Paraplegiology, REHAB Basel, Im Burgfelderhof 40, CH-4055, Basel, Switzerland. anna.walter@unibas.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3939-0232
Swiss Paraplegic Center · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeNeuropathic pain is a clinically relevant complication in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). Pharmacological pain treatment is often insufficient and leads to undesirable side effects. Thus, alternative therapeutic approaches such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) are of critical importance. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of rTMS in neuropathic pain secondary to SCI.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review using the PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycInfo (via OVID) database up April 2021. Only randomized controlled trials were included. Results regarding the pain intensity scores were pooled using a random-effects model.

resultsThe search identified a total of 203 potential articles. Of these, eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) met the eligibility criteria for qualitative synthesis providing the total data of 141 patients. All studies applied high-frequency rTMS. In seven studies, rTMS was applied over the motor cortex, and in one study over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Five studies reported a significant improvement in baseline pain scores after treatment, and three studies found a significant difference between sham vs. non-sham stimulation at any time. Six RCTs were included in the quantitative synthesis and showed a significant overall reduction of pain intensity in the rTMS groups compared with the sham groups (mean difference - 0.81, 95%CI - 1.45 to - 0.17).

conclusionsOur findings indicate that high-frequency rTMS of the primary motor cortex and left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex might be promising stimulation targets for neuropathic pain in SCI.

Indexed as

NeuralgiaSpinal Cord InjuriesHumansPain ManagementPain MeasurementTranscranial Magnetic StimulationTreatment OutcomeNeuropathic painSpinal cord injuryTheta burst stimulationTranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID35239053
OpenAlexW4214844449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.