ArticleEJNMMI physics2022
Noise sensitivity of
Article in EJNMMI physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-axial field-of-view PET/CT improves radiomics feature reliability.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- Using tumor habitat-derived radiomic analysis during pretreatmentCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024Article
- Advances and challenges in immunoPET methodology.Frontiers in nuclear medicine · 2024Review
- Multicentric study on the reproducibility and robustness of PET-based radiomics features with a realistic activity painting phantom.PloS one · 2024Article
- Impact of Aggregation Methods for Texture Features on Their Robustness Performance: Application to NasopharyngealCancers · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeLow photon count in
methodsCount-split
resultsFor S50p, a total of 92% and 90% features were classified as having good or excellent ICC and SDM respectively, while for S25p, these decreased to 81% and 31%. In total, 148 features (31%) showed robustness to noise with good or moderate ICC and SDM in both S50p and S25p. The number of features classified into the four ICC and SDM categories between S50p and S25p was significantly different statistically.
conclusionSeveral radiomic features derived from low SNR
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.