Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35239041›Full record

ArticleJournal of mathematical biology2022

Mathematical model for the estrogen paradox in breast cancer treatment.

Rachid Ouifki, Segun I Oke

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of mathematical biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rachid OuifkiDepartment of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics, North-West University, Mafikeng campus Private Bag X2046, Mmabatho, 2735, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-7697-1792
Segun I OkeDepartment of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics, University of Pretoria, Private bag X20, Hatfield, 0028, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-4987-6287
North-West University · ZAUniversity of Pretoria · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Estrogen is known to stimulate the growth of breast cancer, but is also effective in treating the disease. This is referred to as the"estrogen paradox". Furthermore, short-term treatment with estrogen can successfully eliminate breast cancer, whereas long-term treatment can cause cancer recurrence. Studies highlighted clinical correlations between estrogen and the protein p53 which plays a pivotal role in breast cancer suppression. We sought to investigate how the interplay between estrogen and p53 impacts the dynamics of breast cancer, and further explore if this could be a plausible explanation for the estrogen paradox and the paradoxical tumor recurrence that results from prolonged treatment with estrogen. For this, we propose a novel ODE based mathematical model that accounts for dormant and active cancer cells, along with the estrogen hormone and the p53 protein. We analyze the model's global stability behavior using the Poincaré-Bendixson theorem and results from differential inequalities. We also perform a bifurcation analysis and carry out numerical simulations that elucidate the roles of estrogen and p53 in the estrogen paradox and its long term estrogen paradoxical effect. The mathematical and numerical analyses suggest that the apparent paradoxical role of estrogen could be the result of an interplay between estrogen and p53, and provide explicit conditions under which the paradoxical effect of long-term treatment may be prevented.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEstrogensFemaleHumansModels, TheoreticalNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalEstrogensBifurcationBreast cancerEstrogenEstrogen paradoxGlobal stabilityMathematical modelp53

Identifiers

PMID35239041
OpenAlexW4214942413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.