Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35238987›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of surgery2022

Esophageal Achalasia: Pros and Cons of the Treatment Options.

Mario Costantini, Renato Salvador, Andrea Costantini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. LTBAs in Hernia Surgery: Learning from History.World journal of surgery · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mario CostantiniDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, Chirurgia Generale 1, University of Padua, 2, via Giustiniani, 35128, Padua, Italy. m.costantini@unipd.it.ORCID 0000-0001-9302-8536
Renato SalvadorDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, Chirurgia Generale 1, University of Padua, 2, via Giustiniani, 35128, Padua, Italy.
Andrea CostantiniDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, Chirurgia Generale 1, University of Padua, 2, via Giustiniani, 35128, Padua, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Achalasia is a primary esophageal motility disorder of unknown origin. The goal of treatment is to reduce the resistance caused by a lower esophageal sphincter that fails to relax and is frequently hypertensive. Many treatment options are available to achieve this goal. In this review, we discuss the pros and cons of each therapeutic approach.

Indexed as

Esophageal AchalasiaEsophageal Motility DisordersEsophageal Sphincter, LowerHumansManometry

Identifiers

PMID35238987
PMCPMC9174302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.