Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35238972›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2022

Developing an understanding of artificial intelligence lung nodule risk prediction using insights from the Brock model.

Madhurima R Chetan, Nicholas Dowson, Noah Waterfield Price, Sarim Ather, Angus Nicolson, Fergus V Gleeson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Risk prediction for lung cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-regression.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Madhurima R ChetanDepartment of Radiology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, X-ray Level 2, Headley Way, Headington, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK. madhurima.chetan@doctors.net.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6868-4969
Nicholas DowsonOptellum Ltd, Oxford Centre for Innovation, Oxford, OX1 1BY, UK.
Noah Waterfield PriceOptellum Ltd, Oxford Centre for Innovation, Oxford, OX1 1BY, UK.
Sarim AtherDepartment of Radiology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, X-ray Level 2, Headley Way, Headington, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.
Angus NicolsonOptellum Ltd, Oxford Centre for Innovation, Oxford, OX1 1BY, UK.
Fergus V GleesonDepartment of Radiology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, X-ray Level 2, Headley Way, Headington, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.
John Radcliffe Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine if predictions of the Lung Cancer Prediction convolutional neural network (LCP-CNN) artificial intelligence (AI) model are analogous to the Brock model.

methodsIn total, 10,485 lung nodules in 4660 participants from the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) were analysed. Both manual and automated nodule measurements were inputted into the Brock model, and this was compared to LCP-CNN. The performance of an experimental AI model was tested after ablating imaging features in a manner analogous to removing predictors from the Brock model. First, the nodule was ablated leaving lung parenchyma only. Second, a sphere of the same size as the nodule was implanted in the parenchyma. Third, internal texture of both nodule and parenchyma was ablated.

resultsAutomated axial diameter (AUC 0.883) and automated equivalent spherical diameter (AUC 0.896) significantly improved the accuracy of Brock when compared to manual measurement (AUC 0.873), although not to the level of the LCP-CNN (AUC 0.936). Ablating nodule and parenchyma texture (AUC 0.915) led to a small drop in AI predictive accuracy, as did implanting a sphere of the same size as the nodule (AUC 0.889). Ablating the nodule leaving parenchyma only led to a large drop in AI performance (AUC 0.717).

conclusionsFeature ablation is a feasible technique for understanding AI model predictions. Nodule size and morphology play the largest role in AI prediction, with nodule internal texture and background parenchyma playing a limited role. This is broadly analogous to the relative importance of morphological factors over clinical factors within the Brock model. KEY POINTS: • Brock lung cancer risk prediction accuracy was significantly improved using automated axial or equivalent spherical measurements of lung nodule diameter, when compared to manual measurements. • Predictive accuracy was further improved by using the Lung Cancer Prediction convolutional neural network, an artificial intelligence-based model which obviates the requirement for nodule measurement. • Nodule size and morphology are important factors in artificial intelligence lung cancer risk prediction, with nodule texture and background parenchyma contributing a small, but measurable, role.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsPrecancerous ConditionsArtificial IntelligenceHumansLungNeural Networks, ComputerTomography, X-Ray ComputedAlgorithmsArtificial intelligenceEarly detection of cancerMultidetector computed tomographyNeural networks, Computer

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.